Improving the Performance of the Army Planning and Budget Staff at the Army Headquarters Through the Implementation of a Planning Information System
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v6i1.51981##semicolon##
SISFOREN##common.commaListSeparator## Army Headquarters##common.commaListSeparator## Technology Acceptance Model##common.commaListSeparator## Effectiveness##common.commaListSeparator## Human ResourcesAbstrakt
This study aims to analyze the relationship between technology, organization, and human resources variables and the effectiveness of the Planning Information System (SISFOREN) usage at the Army Headquarters (MABESAD), assess the impact of SISFOREN effectiveness on the performance of the planning department, and identify obstacles faced during implementation. A quantitative approach using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was employed, with data collected through structured surveys distributed to planning and budgeting staff members. The findings reveal that technology does not significantly influence effectiveness (), attributed to implementation challenges and users' limited technical understanding. In contrast, organization positively impacts effectiveness (), highlighting the importance of structured communication and organizational support. Human resources also significantly affect effectiveness (), emphasizing the critical need for comprehensive training programs. Furthermore, the effectiveness of SISFOREN significantly enhances planning performance (), demonstrating improvements in data monitoring, decision-making speed, and administrative efficiency. However, obstacles such as inadequate technology integration, user skill gaps, and unsupportive organizational structures persist. The study contributes to understanding information system implementation in military contexts and provides practical recommendations for optimizing SISFOREN's deployment. Addressing these identified issues is essential for maximizing SISFOREN's implementation success and improving its overall efficiency in supporting the Indonesian Army's planning and budgeting operations.
##submission.citations##
Ariyani, N., & Widodo, M. (2021). The impact of military organizational culture on the successful implementation of information systems: A case study of the Indonesian Army. Journal of Military Information Systems, 8(3), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmis.2021.04.006
Budi, S., & Nugroho, E. (2021). Exploring the barriers to information system integration in military organizations in Indonesia. International Journal of Defense Technology, 19(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdt.2021.02.005
Budi, T., & Pratama, H. (2021). Strategic planning in military defense: The role of technology in TNI AD operations. Journal of Defense Studies, 14(3), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.03.005
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
Hidayat, S., Rahman, R., & Ali, M. (2020). Technological advancements and military readiness: The role of information technology in the Indonesian Army. International Journal of Military Technology, 18(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/ijmt.2020.02.007
Huda, M. N., Kurniasari, E. N., & Ruroh, S. M. (2022). A systematic literature review of e-government evaluation. Journal of Local Government Issues, 5(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v5i1.19784
Lee, H., Kim, Y., & Lee, K. (2005). The impact of information systems on organizational performance: The role of human and organizational factors. Information & Management, 42(5), 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.12.002
Lestari, A., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Planning information systems in military organizations: A framework for implementation in developing countries. Journal of Information Systems in Defense, 15(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsid.2022.04.003
Lestari, A., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Integrating IT solutions for strategic military planning in Indonesia: A case study of TNI AD. Journal of Information Technology in Defense, 22(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jitd.2023.01.002
Muzid, S., Murti, A. C., & Triyanto, W. A. (2025). SIMPELMAS: An integrated information system for research and community service using a prototype development approach. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi Dan Komputer), 14(2), 129–135.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Rahman, D., Suryana, H., & Yanti, A. (2021). E-government implementation and its challenges: Insights from Indonesia’s public sector. Journal of Government Information Systems, 30(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgis.2021.03.007
Sanmocte, E. M. T., & Costales, J. A. (2025). Exploring effectiveness in software development: A comparative review of system analysis and design methodologies. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 17(1), 1–8.
Santosa, P., Rinaldi, H., & Purnama, Y. (2023). Challenges in implementing military information systems: A case study on SISFOREN at Indonesian Army Headquarters. Journal of Strategic Military Studies, 22(4), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsms.2023.02.014
Suswandi, D., Hanfi, I., & Yusro, M. (2023). Information system planning integrated database of training in food and nutrition at SEAMEO RECFON using TOGAF architecture. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 2(2), 687–706.
Sutanto, M., & Rina, D. (2023). Human resource factors in the implementation of information systems in military organizations: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Military Management, 18(2), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/ijmm.2023.01.004
Taufik, H., & Ismail, R. (2021). Bureaucratic reform and planning in military institutions: The case of TNI AD. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 12(4), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpas.2021.04.008
Taufik, H., & Wibowo, D. (2022). E-government challenges in military institutions: Exploring the Indonesian context. Journal of Public Administration and Technology, 16(5), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpat.2022.07.002
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Yusuf, N., & Rahman, D. (2022). Improving defense operations through technology: The TNI AD’s approach to strategic planning. Military and Strategic Studies Journal, 8(3), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssj.2022.07.006
Yusuf, R., & Pratama, M. (2020). Information system deployment in developing country military structures: Success factors and challenges. Journal of Defense Information Systems, 12(3), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdis.2020.08.003
##submission.downloads##
Publikované
##submission.howToCite##
Číslo
Sekcia
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-sa4.footer##
