The Impact of Corporate Sustainability Initiatives and Public Governance on Corporate Carbon Performance: A Case Study of Companies in ASEAN Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v6i3.52599Keywords:
Corporate Sustainability Initiatives, Carbon Performance, Green Innovation, Resource Efficiency, Public GovernanceAbstract
This study examines the impact of Corporate Sustainability Initiatives (CSI) and Public Governance on corporate carbon performance in ASEAN countries. The research focuses on internal sustainability initiatives represented by green innovation and resource efficiency, as well as external governance factors measured by regulatory quality and government effectiveness. Using a quantitative approach, this study analyzes companies operating in the energy, materials, and industrial sectors across Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and the Philippines. Secondary data were obtained from Refinitiv Eikon and the Worldwide Governance Indicators, and the relationships among variables were tested using Structural Equation Modeling with Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The findings indicate that resource efficiency has a positive and significant effect on corporate carbon performance, highlighting the importance of operational efficiency in reducing carbon emissions. In contrast, green innovation does not show a significant effect, suggesting that green innovation in ASEAN firms tends to be symbolic rather than transformational. Furthermore, government effectiveness demonstrates a significant negative relationship with carbon intensity, implying that more effective governance is associated with better carbon performance. Regulatory quality, however, does not show a significant effect. Firm size positively affects carbon performance, while leverage shows no significant effect. Overall, the results emphasize that improving corporate carbon performance in ASEAN requires a combination of substantive internal sustainability initiatives and effective public governance. This study contributes to the sustainability and governance literature by providing empirical evidence from a developing regional context and offers practical insights policymakers and corporate managers in designing effective strategies to achieve carbon reduction goals.
References
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res016
Al-Fakir Al Rabab’a, E., Rashid, A., & Shams, S. (2023). Corporate carbon performance and cost of debt: Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102641
Alofaysan, H., Jarboui, S., & Binsuwadan, J. (2024). Corporate sustainability, sustainable governance, and firm value efficiency: Evidence from Saudi listed companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135436
Azimi, M. N., Rahman, M. M., & Nghiem, S. (2023). Linking governance with environmental quality: a global perspective. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42221-y
Chang, S. J. (2016). Sustainable evolution for global business: A synthetic review of the literature. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v6n1p1
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Handoyo, S. (2023). Worldwide governance indicators: Cross country data set 2012–2022. Data in Brief, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109814
Handoyo, S., & Anas, S. (2024). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) on firm performance: The moderating role of country regulatory quality and government effectiveness in ASEAN. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2371071
Haque, F. (2022). Do corporate sustainability initiatives improve corporate carbon performance? Evidence from European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3318–3334. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3078
Haque, F., & Ntim, C. G. (2022). Do corporate sustainability initiatives improve corporate carbon performance? Evidence from European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3318–3334. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3078
Heiss, A., & Johnson, T. (2016). Internal, interactive, and institutional factors: A unified framework for understanding international NGOs. International Studies Review, 18(3), 528–541.
Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
Huang, Y., Wen, W., & Bao, R. (2024a). Carbon emission right circulation and corporate green innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Finance Research Letters, 69, 106143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106143
Huang, Y., Wen, W., & Bao, R. (2024b). Carbon emission right circulation and corporate green innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Finance Research Letters, 69, 106143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106143
Hwang, K. (2023). The relevance of neo-institutionalism for organizational change. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2).
Issa, A. (2024). Do emissions reduction initiatives improve financial performance? Empirical analysis of moderating factors. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 32(2), 228–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-04-2023-0107
Issa, A., & In’airat, M. (2024). From words to action: Unpacking the real impact of sustainability initiatives on carbon emissions reduction. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(3), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2023-0320
Ju, W., & Jin, S. (2024). The impact of green innovation on the carbon performance of Chinese manufacturing enterprises: Moderating role of internal governance. Heliyon, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31272
Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2024). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and 2024 update. Elsevier BV.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pana Sabila, Sofik Handoyo, Gia Kardina Prima Amrania
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
