Conservation-Compatible Oil Palm Development: Integrating High Conservation Value (HCV) Safeguards in Mandailing Natal, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i10.52136Keywords:
ABKT, conservation, deforestation, High Conservation Value (HCV), Indonesia, land use planning, Mandailing Natal, oil palm, smallholders, sustainable agricultureAbstract
The global palm oil industry faces increasing pressure to eliminate deforestation from its supply chains, driven by international commitments such as the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) standards, and Indonesia’s Forest and Other Land Use (FOLU) Net Sink 2030 commitment. These frameworks require effective mechanisms to identify and safeguard ecologically and socially valuable landscapes within agricultural frontiers. Integrating High Conservation Value (HCV) principles into land use planning is therefore critical to balancing commodity production, biodiversity conservation, and community rights. This study analyzes how oil palm development in Mandailing Natal, North Sumatra, can align with High Conservation Value (HCV) protection. Using a 2024 district-wide ABKT-HCS (High Conservation Value and High Carbon Stock) assessment and scenario modeling, the study examines forest encroachment, institutional fragmentation, and policy gaps undermining sustainable land use. Although more than half of the district is legally defined as forest, rapid plantation expansion—driven by smallholder pressures, tenure insecurity, and weak inter-agency coordination—continues to erode ecological integrity and cultural landscapes. Scenario analysis shows that improving yields through Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and participatory zoning can enhance productivity without new deforestation. The paper recommends integrating ABKT spatial data into formal land-use planning, institutionalizing Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), and implementing community-based monitoring. These strategies support a jurisdictional sustainability transition consistent with Indonesia’s FOLU Net Sink 2030 objective.
References
Abidin, H. Z., Sarbini, N., Rosalina, L., Riyadi, D. S., Utomo, W., & Wijanarto, A. B. (2021). One Map Policy of Indonesia: Status, challenges, and prospects. In FIG E-Working Week 2021: Smart Surveyors for Land and Water Management – Challenges in a New Reality (pp. 1–16). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352761169
Aisyah, D. D., Irham, & Mulyo, J. H. (2021). How does willingness and ability to pay of palm oil smallholders affect their willingness to participate in Indonesian sustainable palm oil certification? Empirical evidence from North Sumatra. Open Agriculture, 6(1), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2021-0019
Bappeda Kab. Mandailing Natal. (2016). Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Mandailing Natal No. 8 tahun 2016 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Mandailing Natal tahun 2016–2036.
Barri, M. F., Setiawan, A. A., Oktaviani, A. R., Prayoga, A. P., & Ichsan, A. C. (2018). Deforestasi tanpa henti: Potret deforestasi di Sumatera Utara, Kalimantan Timur, dan Maluku Utara (A. Ruwindrijarto & C. Purba, Eds.). Forest Watch Indonesia. http://www.fwi.or.id
Boyd, W., Stickler, C., Duchelle, A. E., Seymour, F., Nepstad, D., Bahar, N. H. A., & Rodriguez-Ward, D. (2018). Jurisdictional approaches to reducing deforestation. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 1(1), 1–14.
Bretz, K. J. (2017). Indonesia’s One Map Policy: A critical look at the social implications of a “mess” [Undergraduate thesis, South Carolina Honors College]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25247.87209
Carter, S., Adams, W. M., & Neill, S. (2020). Environmental impact assessments in developing countries: We need to talk about politics. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 83, 106398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106398
Colchester, M., Chao, S., Anderson, P., & Jonas, H. (2015). Free, prior and informed consent guide for RSPO members. RSPO and Forest Peoples Programme.
Daulay, M. H., Susanti, F. D., Laraswati, D., Arthalina, E. C., & Maryudi, A. (2023). New land governance models and management scenarios: Fitting forest management units (FMUs) for forested landscapes outside forest zones in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 7(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v7i1.23962
Fishman, A., Oliveira, E., & Simmons, B. A. (2022). The limits of corporate-led sustainability in tropical commodity supply chains. World Development, 151, 105752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105752
Global Environment Facility (GEF). (2024). An evaluation report by the GEF IEO: Evaluation of community-based approaches at the GEF. https://www.gefieo.org/evaluations
LANDac. (2017). Food security and land governance factsheet: Indonesia. https://www.landgovernance.org
Moeliono, M., Gaveau, D., Banjade, M. R., & Wollenberg, E. (2017). Landscape governance for improving community livelihoods and land use sustainability. Forest and Society, 1(1), 1–6.
Myers, R., Larson, A. M., Ravikumar, A., Trench, T., & Guanacaste, D. (2018). Participatory monitoring in forest communities to improve governance, accountability, and forest outcomes. Society & Natural Resources, 31(5), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1423438
Permatasari, A. P., Fauziyah, D., Naufal, F. A., Afian, S., Nisa, S. C., & Fetra, T. (2024). Membangun kesiapan Indonesia dalam menghadapi aturan bebas deforestasi Uni Eropa melalui perbaikan tata kelola dan kemitraan yang inklusif.
PT Hatfield Indonesia. (2025a). ABKT assessment in Mandailing Natal District, North Sumatra.
PT Hatfield Indonesia. (2025b). Atlas map of ABKT assessment in Mandailing Natal District and targeted scenario analysis (TSA) study in North Sumatra.
PT Hatfield Indonesia. (2025c). Targeted scenario analysis (TSA) in North Sumatra Province.
Shahab, N. (2016). Indonesia: One Map Policy overlapping land claims and conflicts. In Open Government Partnership. http://fwi.or.id/publikasi/potret-keadaan-hutan-indonesia
Stickler, C. M., Duchelle, A. E., Ardila, J. P., Nepstad, D. C., David, O. R., Chan, C., Rojas, J. G., Vargas, R., Bezerra, T., Pritchard, L., Simmonds, J., Durbin, J., Simonet, G., Peteru, S., Komalasari, M., DiGiano, M., & Warren, M. (2018). The state of jurisdictional sustainability: Synthesis for practitioners and policymakers. Earth Innovation Institute; Center for International Forestry Research; Governors’ Climate & Forests Task Force Secretariat. https://earthinnovation.org/state-of-jurisdictional-sustainability
Suich, H., Lugina, M., Muttaqin, M. Z., Alviya, I., & Sari, G. K. (2017). Payments for ecosystem services in Indonesia. Oryx, 51(3), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000259
Treviño, M., Rasmussen, L. V., & Larson, A. M. (2017). Institutional analysis of landscape governance in Indonesia: A policy mix approach. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1740
van Dick, W. F. A., Lokhorst, A. M., Barendse, F., & de Snoo, G. R. (2015). Collective agri-environment schemes: How can regional environmental cooperatives enhance farmers’ intentions for agri-environment schemes? Land Use Policy, 52, 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.014
Wunder, S., Brouwer, R., Engel, S., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Muradian, R., Pascual, U., & Pinto, R. (2020). From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services. Nature Sustainability, 1(3), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0457-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bambang Tri Sasongko Adi, Surahman Putra, Ratna Kusuma Sari, Bonie Dewantara, Puspita Suryaningtyas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
