Effect of Liquid-to-Solid (L/S) Ratio on The Characteristics of Metakaolinbased Geopolymer Mortar for Lightweight Panel Applications
Downloads
The development of low-carbon construction materials has become increasingly important to mitigate the environmental impacts associated with the extensive use of Portland cement. Metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar has emerged as a promising alternative binder due to its environmental advantages and favorable engineering properties. This study aimed to determine the optimum liquid-to-solid (L/S) ratio and evaluate its effects on the compressive strength, density, and water absorption of metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar. An experimental laboratory investigation was conducted using five liquid-to-solid (L/S) ratios of 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, 0.55, and 0.60. The evaluated properties included compressive strength, density, and water absorption. Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).The L/S ratio significantly influenced all measured properties. The optimum performance was achieved at an L/S ratio of 0.45, which resulted in the highest compressive strength (16.60 MPa), the highest density (1.96 g/cm³), and the lowest water absorption (4%). One-way ANOVA confirmed that the L/S ratio had a significant effect on compressive strength, density, and water absorption (p < 0.001). The liquid-to-solid ratio was identified as a critical parameter governing microstructural densification, porosity development, and the physical and mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar. An L/S ratio of 0.45 was recommended as the optimum condition for achieving balanced mechanical performance and durability-related properties.
Adesina, A. (2020). Recent advances in the concrete industry to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions. Environmental Challenges, 1, 100004.
Davidovits, J. (2013). Geopolymer cement review 2013. Geopolymer Institute Technical Papers, 21, 1–11.
Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Palomo, A., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2007). Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. Journal of Materials Science, 42(9), 2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z
Gonnon, P., & Lootens, D. (2023). Toward net zero carbon for concrete and mortar: Clinker substitution with ground calcium carbonate. Cement and Concrete Composites, 142, 105190.
Habert, G., Miller, S. A., John, V. M., Provis, J. L., Favier, A., Horvath, A., & Scrivener, K. L. (2020). Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(11), 559–573.
Heah, C. Y., Kamarudin, H., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Bnhussain, M., Luqman, M., Nizar, I. K., Ruzaidi, C. M., & Liew, Y. M. (2012). Study on solids-to-liquid and alkaline activator ratios on kaolin-based geopolymers. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 912–922.
Jamaludin, L., Razak, R. A., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Vizureanu, P., Sandu, A. V., Abd Rahim, S. Z., & Ahmad, R. (2023). Solid-to-liquid ratio influenced on adhesion strength of metakaolin geopolymer coating paste added photocatalyst materials. Coatings, 13(2), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13020236
Jaya, N. A., Liew, Y. M., Heah, C. Y., & Abdullah, M. M. A. B. (2018). Effect of solid-to-liquid ratios on metakaolin geopolymers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2045(1), 020099.
Kioupis, D., Skaropoulou, A., Tsivilis, S., & Kakali, G. (2022). Properties and durability performance of lightweight fly ash based geopolymer composites incorporating expanded polystyrene and expanded perlite. Ceramics, 5(4), 821–836.
Koçyiğit, Ş. (2024). Performance evaluation of geopolymer mortars containing waste ferrochrome slag and fly ash for sustainable green building. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 14606.
Longo, F., Lassandro, P., Moshiri, A., Phatak, T., Aiello, M. A., & Krakowiak, K. J. (2020). Lightweight geopolymer-based mortars for the structural and energy retrofit of buildings. Energy and Buildings, 225, 110352.
Miller, S. A., John, V. M., Pacca, S. A., & Horvath, A. (2018). Carbon dioxide reduction potential in the global cement industry by 2050. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 115–124.
Novais, R. M., Buruberri, L. H., Seabra, M. P., & Labrincha, J. A. (2020). Novel lightweight geopolymer materials: A review. Materials, 13(3), 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030775
Panagiotopoulou, C., Kontori, E., Perraki, T., & Kakali, G. (2007). Dissolution of aluminosilicate minerals and by-products in alkaline media. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 353, 2040–2049.
Przybek, A., Romańska, P., Korniejenko, K., Krajniak, K., Hebdowska-Krupa, M., & Łach, M. (2025). Thermal properties of geopolymer concretes with lightweight aggregates. Materials, 18(13), 3150.
Rathinavel, N., Aleem, A., & Ismail, M. (2025). Energy-efficient geopolymer wall panels: Optimizing mechanical, thermal, and acoustic properties for sustainable construction. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 25851.
Raza, A., Ghazouani, N., & Ahmed, M. (2025). Lightweight engineered geopolymer composites with carbon nanotubes and lightweight aggregates: Enhancing thermal resistance and mechanical strength. JOM, 77(12), 10053–10064.
Razak, S. A., Zainal, F. F., & Shamsudin, S. R. (2020). Effect of porosity and water absorption on compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymer and OPC paste. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 957, 012035.
Shah, I. H., Miller, S. A., Jiang, D., & Myers, R. J. (2022). Cement substitution with secondary materials can reduce annual global CO₂ emissions by up to 1.3 gigatons. Nature Communications, 13(1), 5758.
Tchakouté, H. K., & Rüscher, C. H. (2017). Mechanical and microstructural properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers: A review. Ceramics International, 43(2), 1613–1628.
Copyright (c) 2026 Alriadi Alriadi, Jauhar Fajrin, Ni Nyoman Kencanawati, Ngudiyono Ngudiyono, Akmaluddin Akmaluddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
