Assessing The Impact Of Surgical Approaches On Total HIP Replace-ment Outcomes: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i11.1814Keywords:
Surgical Approach, Total Hip Replacement, Outcome, ImpactAbstract
Total hip replacement is one of the most common and effective orthopedic surgical procedures to reduce pain and improve hip function in patients with severe conditions. This procedure has undergone many advances in the past few decades. However, there is debate among surgeons about which surgical approach is the most optimal to apply. This study aims to systematically assess and compare the outcomes of different surgical approaches in total hip replacement (THR) procedures. The method used in this study was a systematic literature review, in which literature was searched through academic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using relevant keywords. The collected data were then analyzed through three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of this study show that each surgical method for total hip replacement has different advantages and disadvantages. The choice of surgical approach should be tailored to each patient's specific condition. Based on a review of the available literature, the anterior approach is often considered superior to the other approaches. The advantages include less surgical trauma, better postoperative pain reduction and a faster rehabilitation process. The anterior approach is considered safe, reliable and effective, and results in lower pain levels compared to other methods
References
Bi Amlie, E., Havelin, L. I., Furnes, O., Baste, V., Nordsletten, L., Hovik, O., & Dimmen, S. (2014). Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1–3 years after surgery. Acta orthopaedica, 85(5), 463-469.
Bota, N. C., Nistor, D. V., Caterev, S., & Todor, A. (2021). Historical overview of hip arthroplasty: From humble beginnings to a high-tech future. Orthopedic reviews, 13(1).
Castioni, D., Galasso, O., Iannò, B., Mercurio, M., & Gasparini, G. (2021). Posterior versus lateral surgical approach: functionality and quality of life after total hip arthroplasty in a matched cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22, 1-9.
Cheng, T. E., Wallis, J. A., Taylor, N. F., Holden, C. T., Marks, P., Smith, C. L., ... & Singh, P. J. (2017). A prospective randomized clinical trial in total hip arthroplasty—comparing early results between the direct anterior approach and the posterior approach. The Journal of arthroplasty, 32(3), 883-890.
De Anta-Díaz, B., Serralta-Gomis, J., Lizaur-Utrilla, A., Benavidez, E., & López-Prats, F. A. (2016). No differences between direct anterior and lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty related to muscle damage or functional outcome. International orthopaedics, 40, 2025-2030.
Günther, K. P., Deckert, S., Lützner, C., Lange, T., Schmitt, J., & Postler, A. (2021). Total Hip Replacement for Osteoarthritis—Evidence-Based and Patient-Oriented Indications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 118(43), 730.
Hart, A., Wyles, C. C., Abdel, M. P., Perry, K. I., Pagnano, M. W., & Taunton, M. J. (2019). Thirty-day major and minor complications following total hip arthroplasty—a comparison of the direct anterior, lateral, and posterior approaches. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34(11), 2681-2685.
Hürlimann, M., Schiapparelli, F. F., Rotigliano, N., Testa, E., Amsler, F., & Hirschmann, M. T. (2017). Influence of surgical approach on heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty–is minimal invasive better? A case control study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 18, 1-9.
Kucukdurmaz, F., Sukeik, M., & Parvizi, J. (2019). A meta-analysis comparing the direct anterior with other approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. The Surgeon, 17(5), 291-299.
Luo, Z. L., Chen, M., Shang, X. F., Hu, F., Ni, Z., Cheng, P., ... & Zhang, X. Q. (2016). Direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 96(35), 2807-2812.
Migliorini, F., Biagini, M., Rath, B., Meisen, N., Tingart, M., & Eschweiler, J. (2019). Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials. International orthopaedics, 43, 1573-1582.
Mjaaland, K. E., Svenningsen, S., Fenstad, A. M., Havelin, L. I., Furnes, O., & Nordsletten, L. (2017). Implant survival after minimally invasive anterior or anterolateral vs. conventional posterior or direct lateral approach: an analysis of 21,860 total hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2008 to 2013). JBJS, 99(10), 840-847.
Nistor, D. V., Caterev, S., Bolboacă, S. D., Cosma, D., Lucaciu, D. O. G., & Todor, A. (2017). Transitioning to the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Is it a true muscle sparing approach when performed by a low volume hip replacement surgeon?. International orthopaedics, 41, 2245-2252.
Parvizi, J., Restrepo, C., & Maltenfort, M. G. (2016). Total hip arthroplasty performed through direct anterior approach provides superior early outcome: results of a randomized, prospective study. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 47(3), 497-504.
Petis, S., Howard, J. L., Lanting, B. L., & Vasarhelyi, E. M. (2015). Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 58(2), 128.
Repantis, T., Bouras, T., & Korovessis, P. (2015). Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 25, 111-116.
Shan, L., Shan, B., Graham, D., & Saxena, A. (2014). Total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis on mid-term quality of life. Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 22(3), 389-406.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333-339.
Supra, R., Supra, R., & Agrawal, D. K. (2023). Surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine, 5(2), 232.
Wang, Z., Hou, J. Z., Wu, C. H., Zhou, Y. J., Gu, X. M., Wang, H. H., ... & Bao, H. W. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 13, 1-11.
Yan, L., Ge, L., Dong, S., Saluja, K., Li, D., Reddy, K. S., ... & Wang, B. (2023). Evaluation of comparative efficacy and safety of surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open, 6(1), e2253942-e2253942.
Yue, C., Kang, P., & Pei, F. (2015). Comparison of direct anterior and lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). Medicine, 94(50), e2126.
Zhao, H. Y., Kang, P. D., Xia, Y. Y., Shi, X. J., Nie, Y., & Pei, F. X. (2017). Comparison of early functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior or posterolateral approach: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of arthroplasty, 32(11), 3421-3428.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andriessanto C. Lengkong, Rangga B.V Rawung, Stefan A.G.P Kambey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
