The Stand Of Electronic Evidence In Cyber Crime Law Enforcement In Indonesia

Authors

  • Dewic Sri Ratnaning Dhumillah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i9.1812

Keywords:

Electronic Evidence, Punishment, Cyber Crime

Abstract

Crime in the cyber world certainly has a significant impact. People think that Indonesia has a Criminal Code that cannot cover crimes in cyberspace, which is a new crime. This is what makes the government have to issue regulations regarding cyber crime or cyber crime. With regard to enforcing cybercrime law, of course, a regulation is needed in positive law. It also regulates the punishment and how the evidence for cyber crimes and the position of electronic evidence are. This research method uses the normative method. The existence of electronic evidence in proving cybercrime has been alluded to in Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions. In Article 5 of Law Number 11 of 2008, it explicitly mandates that "Electronic Information and/or Electronic Documents and/or their printouts are valid legal evidence". This can be interpreted that electronic documents are considered legally valid according to positive law in Indonesia. However, in the amendment to the elucidation of Article 5 paragraph (1) regulated in Law Number 19 of 2016, it is explained that the existence of Electronic Information and/or Electronic Documents is binding and recognized as valid evidence to provide legal certainty for the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions Electronic, especially in proving and matters relating to legal actions carried out through Electronic Systems.

References

Abidin, Dodo Zaenal. (2015). Kejahatan dalam Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Jurnal Processor, 10(2), 509–516.

Alhakim, Abdurrakhman, & Sofia, Sofia. (2021). Kajian Normatif Penanganan Cyber Crime Di Sektor Perbankan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(2), 377–385.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2006). Tindak pidana mayantara: perkembangan kajian cyber crime di Indonesia.

Galih, Yuliana Surya. (2019). Yurisdiksi Hukum Pidana Dalam Dunia Maya. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 7(1), 59–74.

Hamzah, Andi. (1989). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Pidana di Bidang Komputer. Jakarta: Sinar.

Hamzah, Andi, & Marsita, Budi. (2015). Aspek-Aspek Pidana di Bidang Transaksi Online. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hartanto, Hartanto. (2021). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENGGUNA TEKNOLOGI INFORMATIKA SEBAGAI KORBAN DARI PELAKU CYBER CRIME DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (UU ITE). HERMENEUTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2).

Ismail, Dian Ekawati. (2009). Cyber crime di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi, 6(03).

Nugroho, Agus Digdo. (2021). DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK Tantangan Transformasi Karakteristik Akta di Era Digital dan Konsekuensi Hukumnya, Yogyakarta: Sulur Pustaka, 2021. Yogyakarta: Sulur Pustaka.

Raodia, Raodia. (2019). Pengaruh Perkembangan Teknologi Terhadap Terjadinya Kejahatan Mayantara (Cybercrime). Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 6(2), 230–239.

Sari, Utin Indah Permata. (2021). Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum Dalam Upaya Penanganan Cyber Crime Yang Dilakukan Oleh Virtual Police Di Indonesia. Jurnal Studia Legalia, 2(01), 58–77.

Suseno, Sigid. (2012). Yurisdiksi Tindak Pidana Siber. Refika Aditama.

van Apeldoorn, L. J. (2011). Inleiding Tot De Studie Van Het Nederlandse Recht (Pengantar Ilmu Hukum). Diterjemahkan oleh Oetarid Sadino, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

Wahyudi, Dheny. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan Cyber Crime Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, 4(1), 43295.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-09

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.