Audits Without Follow-Up Are A Waste of Time: an Evaluation of Special Audits at The Inspector General’s Office of Ministry X
Downloads
Effective audits require audited entities to promptly implement recommendations; otherwise, identified risks, regulatory violations, and potential state losses may persist. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of follow-up actions on Special Audit recommendations at the Inspectorate General of Ministry X during 2018–2024, identify implementation barriers, and formulate improvement strategies. An embedded single-case study design with a mixed-methods approach was employed. Secondary data comprised Special Audit reports, recommendation summaries, minutes of meetings, and relevant regulations, while primary data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with four officials and a Likert-scale survey of 46 audited entities, comprising 12 ministry work units and 34 regional governments. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, and methodological triangulation. Of the 318 recommendations, 74% were followed up within 60 days; however, only 61% achieved compliant completion status, indicating that overall implementation effectiveness remained limited. Regional governments achieved a 76% completion rate, whereas ministry work units achieved only 28%. Leadership commitment and administrative constraints were the dominant internal barriers, while weak communication and monitoring mechanisms primarily affected regional governments. Respondents supported the implementation of early-warning systems, online consultation platforms, technical guidance, and differentiated regulatory measures. The study concluded that effective follow-up requires tailored interventions combining stronger leadership accountability, digital monitoring, enforceable sanctions, sustained capacity development, and institutional oversight.
Andriana, N. (2016). Analisis faktor-faktor penyebab belum optimalnya pengelolaan tindak lanjut temuan audit pada Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan [Tesis magister, Universitas Indonesia].
Budaya, A. (2016). Analisis tindak lanjut atas rekomendasi audit oleh Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia pada Unit Pembinaan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah: Studi kasus pada Unit Pembinaan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta tahun 2016 [Tesis magister, Universitas Gadjah Mada].
Campa, D., Quagli, A., & Ramassa, P. (2025). The roles and interplay of enforcers and auditors in the context of accounting fraud: A review of the accounting literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(5), 151–183.
Celestin, M. (2020a). How audit failures in major corporate scandals have led to stricter assurance standards and regulations. Brainae Journal of Business, Sciences and Technology, 4(6), 823–834.
Celestin, M. (2020b). The effect of regulatory changes on auditing standards: How global compliance rules are reshaping the audit profession. Brainae Journal of Business, Sciences and Technology, 4(1), 34–43.
Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2017). Enterprise risk management and the financial reporting process: The experiences of audit committee members, CFOs, and external auditors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1178–1209.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Salemba Humanika.
Denaro, N., Merlano, M. C., & Russi, E. G. (2016). Follow-up in head and neck cancer: Do more does it mean do better? A systematic review and our proposal based on our experience. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 9(4), 287–297.
Gavrilenko, V., & Shenshin, V. (2023). Control and supervisory activities as an institute of administrative law. BRICS Law Journal, 10(2), 156–183.
Haryoko, S. (2020). Metodologi penelitian. Badan Penerbit Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Henriques, J., Caldeira, F., Cruz, T., & Simões, P. (2024). A survey on forensics and compliance auditing for critical infrastructure protection. IEEE Access, 12, 2409–2444.
Kahyaoğlu, S. B., Sarıkaya, R., & Topal, B. (2020). Continuous auditing as a strategic tool in public sector internal audit: The Turkish case. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 23(1), 208–225.
Kristiawan, L. (2014). Analisis hasil audit dan tindak lanjut temuan pengawasan Inspektorat tahun 2008 sampai dengan 2012: Studi kasus pada Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kesejahteraan Rakyat [Tesis magister, Universitas Indonesia].
Madhavan, K., Yazdinejad, A., Zarrinkalam, F., & Dehghantanha, A. (2025). Quantifying security vulnerabilities: A metric-driven security analysis of gaps in current AI standards. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08610
Mahmudi. (2019). Manajemen kinerja sektor publik (Edisi ke-3). UPP STIM YKPN.
Murtezaj, I. M., et al. (2024). The study and application of moral principles and values in the fields of accounting and auditing. International Journal of Religion, 5(5), 678–693.
Pongoliu, R. R., Saerang, D., & Manossoh, H. (2017). Analisis hambatan dalam penyelesaian tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan BPK pada Pemerintah Provinsi Gorontalo. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Research “Goodwill,” 8(1), 1–13.
Pratomo, H. (2022). Evaluasi efektivitas tindak lanjut rekomendasi laporan hasil pemeriksaan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Polewali Mandar [Tesis magister, Universitas Indonesia].
Schreiber, D., et al. (2015). Five-year follow-up after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using the stepwise approach and prognostic factors for success. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 8(2), 308–317.
Terwindt, C., & Armstrong, A. (2019). Oversight and accountability in the social auditing industry: The role of social compliance initiatives. International Labour Review, 158(2), 245–272.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Copyright (c) 2026 Yofan Hasudungan Marpaung, Ratna Wardhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
