The Influence of University X's Marketing Mix on Prospective Students' Purchase Intention in Bandung City
Downloads
This study analyzes the effect of service marketing mix elements—product, price, place, promotion, people, process, and physical evidence—on the purchase intention of prospective students toward University X in Bandung. The research addresses increasing competition among private universities and declining new student enrollment, which require more effective marketing strategies. A quantitative survey method was employed with 326 respondents from 60 high schools, vocational schools, and community learning centers in Bandung and the surrounding areas. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted on 241 respondents in grades 10–12 who were aware of University X, with the results compared to those of 145 respondents from grades 11–12. In the overall analysis, price and people significantly influence purchase intention, while promotion shows a very weak effect. Product, place, and physical evidence show no significant effect. In the grade 11–12 segment, process is the only significant variable. The findings recommend marketing strategies focused on improving pricing and scholarship schemes, enhancing human resource competencies among lecturers, academic staff, students, and alumni, strengthening promotional efforts, and optimizing service processes. The study confirms that, in the higher education context, price, people, and process are dominant predictors of purchase intention, providing strategic insights for University X decision-makers.
Al-Adwan, A. S., & Khdour, N. (2020). Exploring student readiness to MOOCs in Jordan: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19.
Alem, F., Plaisent, M., Zuccaro, C., & Bernard, P. (2016). Measuring e-learning readiness concept: Scale development and validation using structural equation modeling. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 6(4), 193–205.
Brkanlić, S., Sánchez-García, J., Esteve, E. B., Brkić, I., Ćirić, M., Tatarski, J., Gardašević, J., & Petrović, M. (2020). Marketing mix instruments as factors of improvement of students' satisfaction in higher education institutions in Republic of Serbia and Spain. Sustainability, 12(18), 7802.
Castro Benavides, L. M., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291.
Chitamba, A., Nyamurima, S., Mugano, G., & Mutambara, E. (2025). Capacity, funding and knowledge gaps: Ecosystem challenges to SME ideation—Insights from DUT's Centre for Social Entrepreneurship Rapid Incubator. International Journal of Advanced Business Studies, 4(6), 157–168.
Flores Villarruel, C., & Criollo Delgado, M. (2024). Marketing mix strategies for higher education institutions: A systematic review. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 34(1), 45–67.
Gardner-Cook, K. (2025). Factors influencing student choice in higher education: A contemporary analysis. Higher Education Research Quarterly, 15(2), 123–145.
Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 21 update PLS regresi. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hemsley-Brown, J., Melewar, T. C., Nguyen, B., & Wilson, E. J. (2016). Exploring brand identity, meaning, image, and reputation (BIMIR) in higher education: A special section. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3019–3022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.016
Inside Higher Ed. (2022). What drives college choice decisions. https://www.insidehighered.com
Jain, S., Kumar, P., & Singh, R. (2024). Digital marketing in higher education: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(3), 89–105.
Kompas. (2022, September 7). Seleksi masuk perguruan tinggi negeri diperbarui, jalur mandiri tetap ada. Kompas.id.
Kompas. (2023, August 15). Penggabungan PTS, Kemendikbud: Agar aset besar dan mutu jadi tinggi. Kompas.
Lestari, H. S., & Miswan, M. (2022). The effect of marketing mix of educational services and image formation on student decisions to choose private universities in Bandung. Wiga: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ekonomi, 12(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.30741/wiga.v12i4.909
Moody, J. (2020). Factors that influence college choice decisions. Higher Education Policy Review, 8(4), 234–251.
Phan, S., Hok, T., & Long, S. (2025). Marketing mix as factors impact on student's enrollment in private higher education in Cambodia. Srawung: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.56943/JSSH.V4I2.731
Rojas-Mendez, J. I., Parasuraman, A., & Papadopoulos, N. (2017). Demographics, attitudes, and technology readiness: A cross-cultural analysis and model validation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(1), 18–39.
Rutarindwa, A., Akena, F., & Ocan, J. (2024). Experiences and challenges of the integrated development model on job creation. International Journal of Applied Management and Business, 2(2), 121–134.
Syam, M., Baby, Fawzeeya, K., Linda, S., & Maas, T. (2019). The analysis of marketing mix strategy effect on students decision to choose Faculty of Economics and Business of Universitas Dharmawangsa Medan. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(6), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i6.1173
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014
Copyright (c) 2026 Samuel Tarigan, Cynthia Indira Pohe

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

