Analysis of Economic Feasibility and Compressive Strength of Concrete Based on the Utilization of Red Mud Waste and Sustainable Construction Management

Red Mud Compressive Strength Economic Feasibility Cement Substitution Net Present Value (NPV) Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) Interpretation

Authors

June 3, 2026

Downloads

This research examines red mud as a partial cement substitute in concrete, comparing normal concrete with 25% red-mud concrete (RM25) based on compressive strength, economic feasibility, waste absorption, and LCA environmental impact. Compressive strength tests were conducted at KAN-accredited Wika Beton Laboratory, and economic feasibility was evaluated using NPV, BCR, and IRR for paving-block production. The waste absorption capacity was calculated based on an annual production volume of 5,000 m². The LCA assessment was carried out in accordance with ISO 14040:2006, covering goal and scope definition, life cycle inventory (LCI), life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), and interpretation. The results showed that RM25 achieved a compressive strength of 36.93 MPa at 30 days, higher than normal concrete with 34.15 MPa. Economically, RM25 recorded a production cost of IDR 1,480,085/m³, with a positive NPV, an IRR of 43.9%, and BCR > 1. In addition, RM25 enabled the absorption of approximately 41.8 tons of red mud waste per year in paving-block production. The LCA results also indicated a reduction in environmental impacts, particularly in the global warming potential category, due to reduced cement consumption. Overall, the 25% red-mud formulation is considered feasible for practical implementation as it meets both technical and economic requirements while providing environmental benefits through emission reduction and enhanced industrial waste utilization.

Most read articles by the same author(s)