Connective Action and Meaning Formation in the Digital Era: A Case Study of the #Alleyesonpapua Campaign

Authors

  • Kamaratih Purnama Kusuma Universitas Indonesia
  • Agnes Yusuf Universitas Indonesia
  • Siti Maharani Nabilah Universitas Indonesia
  • Sintya Chalifia Azizah Universitas Indonesia
  • Lucky Alfa Riztri Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i11.52376

Keywords:

Connective Action, Social Construction Technology, Collective Emotions, Social Media, Digital Activism, AllEyesonPapua, #AllEyesonPapua

Abstract

This study examines #AllEyesonPapua digital campaigns as a form of connective action in digital activism that develops organically through social media. This research uses a qualitative approach with interpretive paradigms and case studies to understand how meaning, collective emotions, and digital solidarity are formed in the digital space. Using the perspective of Social Construction of Technology (KST), this study emphasizes that social media is not neutral but rather a social space full of negotiation of meaning and power. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with informants who were actively involved in #AllEyesonPapua campaign interactions in the digital space and analyzed using thematic coding techniques. The results show that #AllEyesonPapua campaigns form digital solidarity through personalized narratives, evocative visual symbols, and strong emotional resonances. Social media acts as an affective space that allows for the expression of collective emotions and the articulation of meaning broadly. The findings also reveal that this campaign faces challenges in the form of stigmatization, digital attacks, and limited access to votes from directly affected communities.

References

Amin, M. E. K., Nørgaard, L. S., Cavaco, A. M., Witry, M. J., Hillman, L., Cernasev, A., & Desselle, S. P. (2023). Establishing trustworthiness and authenticity in qualitative pharmacy research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16(11), 1472–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.005

Bakry, R. A., & Kusmayadi, Y. (2025). Eksplorasi dinamika sosial melalui analisis sentimen tagar #KaburAjaDulu di media sosial TikTok. SABER, 3(2), 26–31.

Budak, C., & Watts, D. J. (2015). Dissecting the spirit of Gezi: Influence vs. selection in the Occupy Gezi movement. Sociological Science, 2, 370–397. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2610055

Cammaerts, B. (2021). The new-new social movements: Are social media changing the ontology of social movements? Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 26(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671x-26-3-343

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2018). The mediated construction of reality. John Wiley & Sons.

Dodgson, J. E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(2), 220–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419830990

Eriyanto, E. (2020). Hashtags and digital movement of opinion mobilization: A social network analysis/SNA study on #BubarkanKPAI vs #KamiBersamaKPAI hashtags. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 8(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v8i3.11591

Fajriadi, M. (2024). Representasi visual dalam kampanye digital #AllEyesonPapua. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media Sosial, 8(1), 45–62.

Ince, J., Rojas, F., & Davis, C. A. (2017). The social media response to Black Lives Matter: How Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1814–1830. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931

Kavada, A. (2018). Connective or collective?: The intersection between online crowds and social movements in contemporary activism. In The Routledge companion to media and activism (pp. 108–116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315475059-11

Kaun, A., & Uldam, J. (2018). Digital activism: After the hype. New Media & Society, 20(6), 2099–2110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731924

Liew, C. L., Goulding, A., & Nichol, M. (2020). From shoeboxes to shared spaces: Participatory cultural heritage via digital platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 25(9), 1293–1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851391

Lim, M. (2020). From networked activism to bureaucratized activism: The case of Indonesia’s #ReformasiDikorupsi movement. Media and Communication, 8(4), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3400

Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press.

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.

Park, S., & Park, S. (2017). The varied spectrum of digital engagement. In Digital capital (pp. 13–34). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59332-0_2

Prihabida, A. D., & Tambunan, S. M. G. (2022). Twitter, please do your magic: Amplifikasi empati di media sosial. Metahumaniora, 12(3), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.24198/metahumaniora.v12i3.39054

Rawhani, C. (2023). Relational coding: Enhancing the transparency and trustworthiness of grounded theory research. Methodological Innovations, 16, 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221144566

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

Shahin, S., & Ng, Y. M. M. (2021). Connective action or collective inertia? Emotion, cognition, and the limits of digitally networked resistance. Social Movement Studies, 21(4), 530–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1928485

Singh, A., & Patel, R. (2020). Building and sustaining a social movement following collective action. Social Movement Studies, 19(3), 288–305.

Soriano, C. R. R., & Cabanes, J. V. A. (2020). Entrepreneurial solidarities: Social media collectives and Filipino digital platform workers. Social Media + Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120926484

Stewart, M., & Schultze, U. (2019). Producing solidarity in social media activism: The case of My Stealthy Freedom. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.003

Trenz, H. J., Brändle, V. K., Cinalli, M., & Eisele, O. (2020). Taking voice and taking sides: The role of social media commenting in solidarity contestation. In Citizens’ solidarity in Europe (pp. 149–176). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909500.00012

Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid media activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. Routledge.

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.

Utama, Y. (2024). Solidaritas digital dan perlawanan simbolik dalam kampanye #AllEyesonPapua. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Digital, 5(2), 88–101.

Wakang, R. (2024). Narasi emosional dan partisipasi kolektif dalam gerakan #AllEyesonPapua. Jurnal Kajian Budaya dan Komunikasi, 12(1), 21–37.

Yayasan Tifa. (2023, 17 Februari). [Siaran pers] Memperluas aktivisme digital untuk hadapi penyempitan ruang sipil di Indonesia. https://www.tifafoundation.id/artikel/siaran-pers-memperluas-aktivisme-digital-untuk-hadapi-penyempitan-ruang-sipil-di-indonesia-2/

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zakky, A., & Rifani, A. N. (2022). COVID-19 and online fundraising: Seeing the pandemic on social media. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 7(2), 618–628. https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2022.2.618

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Kusuma, K. P. ., Yusuf, A., Nabilah, S. M. ., Azizah, S. C. ., & Riztri, L. A. . (2025). Connective Action and Meaning Formation in the Digital Era: A Case Study of the #Alleyesonpapua Campaign. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 5(11), 14140–14149. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i11.52376