Urban Fortifications and Quarantine Strategies During The Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Dita Trisnawan Universitas Indonesia, Salemba, Jakarta
  • Renny Nurhasana Universitas Indonesia, Salemba, Jakarta
  • Chotib Chotib Universitas Indonesia, Salemba, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i6.50191

Keywords:

quarantine, strategic planning, urban health, pandemic, health and architecture, spatial dynamics

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of urban fortifications and quarantine strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on residential enclaves in Jakarta, Indonesia. The research problem centers on how quarantine boundaries were defined within fortified urban enclosures and how residents reacted to spatial changes during the pandemic. The objectives include analyzing the forms of fortification, understanding residents' perceptions, and evaluating the effectiveness of pandemic-related policies. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining online questionnaires with 205 informants, field surveys of 36 residential enclosures, and detailed map-tracing techniques to correct and validate spatial data. Findings reveal that fortifications, such as walls and gates, were reinforced during the pandemic, serving as both physical and symbolic boundaries to limit virus transmission. Residents' perceptions highlighted the importance of safety measures, though these measures sometimes contradicted principles of open urban design. The research also identifies key actors influencing spatial patterns, including local officials, security personnel, and residents. Implications of the study contribute to urban design and architectural theory by proposing methods for mapping fortified boundaries and advocating for balanced, resilient urban planning that integrates health protocols without compromising community openness.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-11

How to Cite

Trisnawan, D., Nurhasana, R. ., & Chotib, C. (2025). Urban Fortifications and Quarantine Strategies During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 5(6), 6067–6079. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i6.50191