Analysis of System Quality Factors & Information Quality with Mediation Variables of Ease of Use To the Success of PT XYZ's E-Procurement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i11.44780Keywords:
E-procurement success, System quality, Information qualityAbstract
This study examines the influence of system quality and information quality on the success of e-procurement at PT XYZ, with a focus on the mediating role of ease of use. Data were collected from 42 respondents in the purchasing department, all users of the e-procurement system, and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Key findings include that system quality and information quality both positively affect ease of use. High-quality systems and accurate information make the e-procurement system easier to use. Information quality also directly enhances the success of e-procurement. Additionally, ease of use positively impacts the success of the system, indicating that when users find the system easy to use, its success rate increases. While system quality alone does not directly impact success, it does so when combined with high information quality and ease of use. For PT XYZ, these findings suggest that improving system quality and information quality can significantly enhance e-procurement success. Practical steps include ensuring robust internet connectivity, comprehensive data documentation, timely updates, and clear, accurate information. Simplifying the e-procurement process and enhancing user skills will also contribute to more effective and efficient procurement operations.
References
Arindra Rossita Arum Nurchana, B. S. (2014). EFFECTIVENESS OF E-PROCUREMENT IN THE PROCUREMENT OF GOODS/SERVICES (Study on the Application of E-Procurement in the Procurement of Goods/Services in Bojonegoro Regency). Journal of Public Administration (JAP), Vol. 2, No. 2,, 355-359.
Attaran, M. (2001). The coming age of online procurement. . Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(4), 77-181.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1), 99-121.
Chen, I. a. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: the. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 22, 119-150.
Christopher, M. (2005). Logistics and Supply Chain Management. UK: Prentice Hall,.
Cocks, M. C. (2008). Information systems and outsourcing: studies in theory and practice.
Croom, S. R. (2000). The impact of web‐based procurement on the management of operating resources supply. Journal of Supply Chain Management 36(4), 4-13.
Croom, S., & Brandon-Jones, A. (2007). Impact of e-procurement: experiences from implementation in the UK public sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(4), 294-303.
Croxton, K. G.-D. (2001). The Supply Chain Management Processes. The International Journal of Logistics Management Vol. 12, No. 2, 13-36.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Vol. 35, No. 8, August 1989, 982-1003.
De Boer, L. H. (2002). A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(1), 25-33.
Delone, W. H., & Mclean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success:A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems / Spring 2003, Vol. 19, No. 4, 9-30.
Devaraj, S. K., & Wei, J. (2007). Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: The role of production information integration in the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management 25(6), 1199-1216.
Easton, L. M. (2002). Purchasing performance evaluation: With data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 8(3), 123-134.
Ellram, L. a. (1993). Characteristics of Supply Chain Management and the Implication for Purchasing and Logistics Strategy. International Journal of Logistics Management, 4, 13-24.
Fernandes, T., & Vieira, V. (2015). Public e-procurement impacts in small-and medium-enterprises. International Journal procurement management 8, (5), 587-607.
Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling, an Alternative Method with Partial Least Square (PLS). Edition 4. Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.
González-Benito, J. (2007). A theory of purchasing's contribution to business performance. . Journal of Operations Management 25(4), 901-917.
Gunasekaran, A. M. (2009). Procurement adoption in the Southcoast SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics 122(1), 161-175.
Hair, J. F. (2017). Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Second Edition (2nd ed.). Los Angeles:: Sage.
Harjito, Y., Achyani, F., & Payamta. (2015). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF E-PROCUREMENT WAS REVIEWED FROM. Journal of Economics and Business Volume XVIII No. 1, April 2015, 61-82.
Hartono, J. (2007). Information Technology System Success Model. Yogyakarta: Andi.
HERIAWATI, L. (2018). THE EFFECT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT AND GOOD GOVERNANCE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF PROCUREMENT OF GOODS/SERVICES IN THE PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES SECTION OF THE REGIONAL SECRETARIAT OF PANDEGLANG REGENCY.
Joginapelly, T. (2011). Effect of web atmospheric cues on users' emotional responses in ecommerce".
Kademaunga, C. K. (2019). Factors Affecting Successful Implementation of Elec-tronic Procurement in Government Institutions Based on the Technology Acceptance Model. Open Journal of Business and Man-agement, 7(4), 705–1714.
Karim, J., & Lasena, M. (2017). Analysis of E-Procurement Policy in the Gorontalo Provincial Government Using the Technology Acceptance Model and End User Computing Satisfaction Method. ILKOM Scientific Journal, Vol. 9, Number 3.
Khairrunnisa, U., & Yunanto, M. (2017). The Effect of System Quality on User Satisfaction and Net Benefits on the Implementation of E-Invoking: Validation of the Success Model of Delone and Mclean Information Systems. Scientific Journal of Business Economics, 22(3).
Krisdiantoro, Y., Subekti, I., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2019). The Effect of System Quality and Information Quality on Net Benefits with Usage Intensity as a Mediation Variable. Journal of Actual Accounting, 5 (3), 261-279.
Software Quality Assessment Criteria Based on ISO 25010. (2024, June 10). Retrieved from https://isoindonesiacenter.com/kriteria-penilaian-kualitas-perangkat-lunak-berdasarkan-iso-25010/
Lambert, D. a. (2000). Issues in Supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 65-83.
Layongan, C. A., Nangoi, G., & Kalalo, M. (2022). The Influence of System Quality and Information Quality of SAP Software on. LPPM Journal of EcoSosBudKum (Economic, Social, Cultural, and Legal) Vol. 5 No. 2 January-June 2022 , 309-322.
Lennon, C. (2002). Achieving Bottom Line Results in a Flat Economy: Leveraging Procurement Business Services. El Segundo, CA: Computr Sciences Corporation.
Love, P. E. (2005). Researching the investment of information technology in construction: An examination of evaluation practices. Automation in Construction, 14(4), 569-582.
Madhani, P. M. (2010). Resource Based View (RBV) of Competitive Advantage: An Overview. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1578704, 3-22.
Mathenge, M. M. (2018). Critical Factors for successful implementation of e-procurement in the Kenyan public sector.
Monczka, D. T. (2005). Purchasing and supply chain management (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems / Spring 2005, Vol. 21, No. 4,, 199-235.
Nofita, M., & Sebastian, D. (2022). Technology Acceptance Models on Digital Technology: SurveyPaper. CONSTELLATION: Convergence of Technology and Information Systems.
Novitaningrum, B. D. (2014). Accountability and Transparency of Government Procurement of Goods and Services Through Electronic Procurement (Best Practice in the Surabaya City Government). Public Policy and Management, Volume 2, Number 1,.
Nugroho, H., Suhud, U., & Rochyati. (2019). THE APPLICATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) THEORY AND MOTIVATION FOR STUDENTS' INTENTION TO USE TABLETS IN JAKARTA. Journal of Communication Studies, 45-64.
Nurchana, A., R., H. B., & Adiono, R. (2014). The Effectiveness of E-Procurement in the Procurement of Goods/Services (Study on the Application of E-Procurement in the Procurement of Goods/Services in Bojonegoro Regency). Journal of Public Administration, 2(2).
Nurdin, I., & Hartati, S. (2019). Social Research Methodology. Surabaya: Media Publisher Sahabat Cendekia.
Panwar, V. &. (2014). Literature Review on the Benefits and Barriers of Electronic Procurement in Organizations. 17.
Parveen, H., & Gull, M. (2017). Conceptual and operational definition of continuous and discrete variables.
Petter, S., DeLone, W. .., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems. Journal of Information Systems, 236–263.
Piotrowicz, W. &. (2010). Analysing B2B electronic procurement benefits: information systems perspective. . Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23(4), 559-579.
Porter, M. (2004). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior. New York: Free Press.
Purwanto, S. K., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2017). The Effect of System Quality, Information Quality, and Service Quality on the Use of e-Learning System in the Postgraduate Program of Mercu Buana University. Journal of Management, 21(2), 282-305.
Puschmann, T., & Alt, R. (2005). Successful use of e-procurement in supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol.10 No.2, 122-133.
Rahim, M. &. (2014). Understanding E-Procurement System Benefits using organisational Adoption Motivation Lens: a Case Study. Paper presented at the PACIS.
Rai, A. L. (2002). Assessing the Validity of IS Success. Information System Research Vol.13, No.1, 29-34.
Ramadhani, K. Y., Adawiyah, W. R., & Novandari, W. (Sustainable Co-mpetitive Advantage, 11(1)). Successful E-Procurement Implementation: A Case Study in a Constr-uction Industry Company. 2021, 938-946.
Sari, I. P., & Arifin, J. (2016). Analysis of Factors Influencing the Successful E-Procurement Implementation. . Analysis of Factors Influencing the Successful E-Procurement Implementation, 1-30.
Sari, I. P., & Arifin, J. (2016). Analysis of Factors Influencing the Successful E-Procurement Implementation. Analysis of Factors Influ-encing the Successful E-Procurement Im-plementation. 1-30.
Setyadi, A., Prianto, S. E., Pawirosumarto, S., & Ismail, S. (2023). FACTORS INFLUENCING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF E-PROCUREMENT WITH PERCEPTIONS OF EASE OF USE AS MEDIATION VARIABLES. JURNAL APLIKASI MANAJEMEN VOLUME 21, 901-914.
Sholihin, M., & Ratmono, D. (2013). SEM-PLS analysis with WarpPLS 3.0. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Siahaya, W. (2013). Sukses Supply Chain Management Akses Demand Chain Management. Jakarta: In Media.
Smart, A. (2010). THE ROLE OF E-PROCUREMENT IN PURCHASING.
Sompotan, R. M., Mandey, S. L., & Saerang, I. S. (2021). The influence of information quality, system quality and regulations. TEXT: Journal of Non-Formal Education, 605-618.
Subramaniam, C., & Shaw, M. J. (2004). The effects of process characteristics on the value of B2B e-procurement. Information Technology and Management ,5(1-2), 161-180.
SUGIYONO. (2004). Business Research Methods. Jakarta: Rineka.
Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Alphabeta.
Tan, K. (2001). A framework of supply chain management literature. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 7, 39-48.
Tulodo, B. A., & Solichin, A. (2019). Analysis of the Influence of System Quality, Quality of Information and Perceived Usefulness on User Satisfaction of Care Applications in Speech of Employee Performance Improvement. Indonesia Journal of Science Management Research, 10(1), 25–43.
Turban, E. K. (2018). Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.
van Weele, A. J. (2014). Purchasing and supply chain management: Analysis, strategy, planning and practic . 6. Hampshire: Cengage Learning.
Wahyudi, R., Astuti, E. S., & Riyadi. (2017). The Effect of the Quality of SIAKAD System, Information and Services on Student Satisfaction. Journal of Business Administration, 23(2), 28-39.
White, A., Johnson, M., & Wilson, H. (2008). RFID in the supply chain: lessons from European early adopters. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 38, 88-107.
Will, L. a. (2008). Information systems and outsourcing: studies in theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Yakin, I. H. (2023). RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (QUANTITATIVE & QUALITATIVE). Garut: CV. ACADEMIC GLOBAL SCRIPT.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kenny Hardinata, Mentiana Sibarani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
