Flexible Approach In English Language Learning Curriculum Design: Optimizing Teaching In Merdeka Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i11.43675Keywords:
curriculum flexibility, Merdeka Curriculum, English language teaching, junior high schoolAbstract
The Merdeka Curriculum implemented in Indonesia aims to create an education system that is more adaptive and responsive to local and global needs. In English language teaching, curriculum flexibility allows teachers to adjust learning materials to students' local contexts, thus encouraging student engagement in the learning process. This study aims to explore the application of flexibility in English curriculum design under the Merdeka Curriculum in five junior high schools in Solok City, West Sumatra. A qualitative approach with a case study method was used, with data collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and student interviews. The results showed that flexibility in the preparation of teaching materials and teaching methods allowed teachers to adjust teaching to local needs. However, teachers faced challenges in balancing local materials with national competency standards and limited resources. This flexibility increased student engagement, although some students struggled without adequate guidance. In conclusion, support in the form of guidance, training, and additional resources are needed to optimize the implementation of curriculum flexibility
References
Agusta, A. R., & Sa’dijah, C. (2021). Kesiapan Guru Melaksanakan Pembelajaran Berbasis Hots Ditinjau Dari Pengetahuan Dan Kemampuan Mengemas Perangkat Pembelajaran. Padaringan (Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi), 3(2), 402–424.
Al Fajri, T. A., & Andarwulan, T. (2023). Implementation Of The Merdeka Curriculum In Indonesia: Challenges And Opportunities. Erudio Journal Of Educational Innovation, 10(2), 204–212.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Clil: Content And Language Integrated Learning (Vol. 9). Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
Fraser, S. P., & Bosanquet, A. M. (2006). The Curriculum? That’s Just A Unit Outline, Isn’t It? Studies In Higher Education, 31(03), 269–284.
Hapudin, H. M. S. (2021). Teori Belajar Dan Pembelajaran: Menciptakan Pembelajaran Yang Kreatif Dan Efektif. Prenada Media.
Harmer, J. (2014). The Practice Of. Modern English Teacher, 21(2).
Irawati, D., Iqbal, A. M., Hasanah, A., & Arifin, B. S. (2022). Profil Pelajar Pancasila Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Karakter Bangsa. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 1224–1238.
Jannah, F., Irtifa’fathuddin, T., & Zahra, P. F. A. (2022). Problematika Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar 2022. Al Yazidiy: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 4(2), 55–65.
Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology And Classroom Practices: An International Study. Journal Of Research On Technology In Education, 36(1), 1–14.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2013). Language Teacher Education For A Global Society. A Modular Model For Knowing, Analyzing, Recognizing, Doing, And Seeing. Language Teacher, 16(4).
Kusuma, T. P. P., & Prasetyo, M. A. W. (2020). Monitoring The Learning Process At Smk Kesatrian Through Kana Buso Application. Intensif: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 4(2), 173–183.
Lieberman, A., & Pointer Mace, D. H. (2008). Teacher Learning: The Key To Educational Reform. Journal Of Teacher Education, 59(3), 226–234.
Macalister, J., & Nation, I. S. P. (2019). Language Curriculum Design. Routledge.
Mahbub, M. A., & Al Fauzi, F. (2018). Identifikasi Kebutuhan Bahasa Inggris Siswa Smk Tkj Melalui Pendekatan Need Analysis. Prosiding Snasppm, 3(1), 116–121.
Marlina, R., Suwono, H., Ibrohim, I., Yuenyong, C., Husamah, H., & Hamdani, H. (2024). Theoretical Frameworks Of Self-Efficacy In Collaborative Science Learning Practices: A Systematic Literature Review. Jpbi (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(2), 602–615.
Mutiah, S. D. (2019). English Teachers’ Assessment Literacy And Online Formative Assessment Implementation In Teaching Writing (Teaching Writing: A Mixed Method Study). Jakarta: Fitk Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Nurhadi, N., Sinaga, K. R., Yusuf, M., Hidayat, R., & Budiarti, Y. (2020). Perbadingan Metode Weight Product Dan Vikor Dalam Menentukan Siswa Berprestasi. Indonesian Journal On Software Engineering (Ijse), 6(2), 270–279.
Nurzen, M., Elimar, T., & Limei, S. (2022). Implementation Of Incung Script Learning As A Form Of Local Wisdom-Based Curriculum Development At Sd Negeri 046/Xi Koto Tengah. At-Tasyrih: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Hukum Islam, 8(1), 85–95.
Prasetyo, M. A., Supriyadi, S., Sulistyani, D., & Arifin, Z. (2022). Reposisi Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Dengan Gugatan Sederhana (Small Claim Court). Jurnal Usm Law Review, 4(2), 905–918.
Pratama, M. E. G., & Kusuma, W. A. (2021). Penggunaan Learning Management System (Lms) Untuk Pembelajaran Dimasa Pandemi. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 2(8), 1545–1554.
Pratikno, Y., Hermawan, E., & Arifin, A. L. (2022). Human Resource ‘Kurikulum Merdeka’from Design To Implementation In The School: What Worked And What Not In Indonesian Education. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 326–343.
Setiawan, A. (2021). Page 307-431. International Conference Character Education And Digital Learning, 1(1).
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology And Social Inclusion: Rethinking The Digital Divide. Mit Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Syifa Fauziah Irsyad, Hermawati Syarif, Yetti Zainil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
