Analysis Of Differences In Evidence In District Court Decisions And Supreme Court Decisions: A Case Study On The Judicial Review Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i10.39013Keywords:
Differences In Evidence, District Court Decision, Supreme Court Decision, Judicial ReviewAbstract
A judicial review (PK) is a legal mechanism given to parties who are dissatisfied with a decision that has permanent legal force, either in the District Court or the Supreme Court. In Indonesia, a PK application can only be submitted once, as regulated in Article 268 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and often involves new evidence (novum) as a basis for requesting a judicial review. The objective to be achieved in this study is to analyze the differences related to the evidence in the District Court decision and the Supreme Court decision in the review process. The method used in this study is juridical normative where the legal material used covers the theory, concept, legal principles and some regulations in accordance with the discussion of research. The method of data collection used is literature study where secondary data are used such as books, laws and related journals. The results of this study indicate that the difference in evidence in conducting judicial review becomes one of the considerations for the acceptance or rejection of PK by the Supreme Court. However, in fact, the specification of the quality of evidence is still not clearly explained where it will only create a blur of norms. Therefore, it is not surprising when the Supreme Court rejected many of the judicial review considering that there was no eligibility for the quality of the evidence received
References
Ahmad, T. F. (2023). Dissenting Opinion Dalam Putusan Ditolaknyaperceraian Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 683/Pdt. G/2020/Pa. Ktp Perkara Cerai Gugat Pengadilan Agama Ketapang). Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Ali, I., Junardi, & Sulfiati, A. (2023). Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ismail. Legal: Journal Of Law Vol., 2(1), 43–55.
Dani Karolustiawan Daulay, S. H. (2023). Implikasi Hukum Atas Putusan Hakim Yang Mengembalikan Barang Bukti Kepada Penuntut Umum Untuk Dipergunakan Dalam Perkara Lain Yang Peraka Tersebut Belum Ada.
Einstein E. Lalamentik. (2018). Peninjauan Kembali Oleh Jaksa Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Journal Of Chemical Information And Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Fatoni, S. (2019). Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Untuk Mengungkapkan Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. Simposium Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 128–138.
Halafah, S. (2022). Efektivitas Eksekusi Putusan Perkara Perdata Yang Telah Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Di Pengadilan Negeri Sunggumina. Journal Of Lex Generalis (Jls), 3(3), 404–417.
Hariansah, S., & Suganda, A. (2023). Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Sumber Daya Alam Antara Nelayan Dan Penambang Di Bangka Belitung. 152–164. Https://Doi.Org/10.24843/Jmhu.2023.V12.I01.P
Hidayat, A. (2023a). Tinjauan Hukum Praperadilan Atas Penetapan Tersangka. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(1), 7–14.
Hidayat, A. (2023b). Tinjauan Hukum Praperadilan Atas Penetapan Tersangka. Paratama Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(1), 8–9.
Kaikobad, K. H. (2021). The International Court Of Justice And Judicial Review: A Study Of The Court’s Powers With Respect To Judgements Of The Ilo And Un Administrative Tribunals (Vol. 6). Brill.
Khasanati, F. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Penyitaan Objek Hak Tanggungan Terhadap Objek Tanah (Studi Kasus Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Nomor 642 Pk/Pdt/2015). Iblam Law Review, 02(03), 143–152.
Loa, F. (2024). Kajian Hukum Lembaga Pra Peradilan Dalam Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham). Lex, Privatum, 13(04).
Maurizkha, V. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Terhadap Peralihan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Dalam Jual Beli Piutang Melalui Cessie (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 79/Pdt. G/2019 Pn Tab Dan Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 754 Pk/Pdt/2011). Lex Patrimonium, 1(1), 2.
Pelu, F. M., Pasalbessy, J. D., & Sopacua, M. G. (2021). Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti ( Novum ) Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Beberapa Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan ( Vide Pasal 338 Kuhp ). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(6), 590–595.
Prasetyoningsih, N. (2023). The Constitutional Court Proceeds With Constitutional Questions Appeals Through Judicial Review. Atlantis Press Sarl. Https://Doi.Org/10.2991/978-2-38476-024-4_68
Pratama, Y. Y., & Ruslie, A. S. (2024). Peninjauan Kembali Tingkat Kedua Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Seikat: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 3(1), 20–25. Https://Doi.Org/10.55681/Seikat.V3i1.1114
Pratomo, B. (2016). Kesesuaian Novum Dalam Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Verstek, 2(1), 1–23.
Pravidjayanto, M. R., & Candra, M. (2024). Kualifikasi Novum Pasca Putusan Mk Hak Konstituional Terpidana Pada. 8(1), 93–116.
Prayogo, L. N. U. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penggunaan Pasal 89 Ayat (1) Uu No. 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama Sebagai Pertimbangan Hukum Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kediri Nomor 242/Pdt. G/2018/Pa. Kdr Tentang Ekonomi Syariah. Iain Kediri.
Rohim Yunus, N., Dewi Anggraeni, R., & Rezki, A. (2020). Extraordinary Legal Efforts Against Review Of Court Decision In Civil Cases In The Constitutional Court Decision Of The Republic Of Indonesia. Journal Of Critical Reviews, 7(15), 1401–1407. Https://Doi.Org/10.31838/Jcr.07.16.141
Saputro, A. B. (2017). Analisis Putusan Hakim Tentang Pembagian Harta Bersama (Gono Gini) Akibat Perceraian (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Surakarta Tahun 2015). Skripsi, Surakarta: Iain.
Suharno, H. S., & Khaerudin, A. (2017). Analisis Hukum Grondkaart Sebagai Bukti Penguasaan Tanah Perkeretaapiaan Indonesia. April 2017, 19–29.
Sumakul, K. I. K. W. A. P. G. F. T. F. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Setelah Ditemukan Alat Bukti Baru Dalam Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 11(1), 217–226.
Syahrial, I. (2022). Pengaruh Penerapan E-Spt, Pengetahuan Perpajakan Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Fiskus Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Di Kpp Pratama Jakarta Kemayoran. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 9(2), 70–84.
W, A. T., & Ginting, R. (2021). Judges’ Legal Considerations (Ratio Decidendi) And Jurisdical Implications On The Criminal Acts Of Continuous Corruption (Study Of Supreme Court Decision No. 866 K/Pid. Sus/2016). International Journal Of Multicultural And Multireligious Understanding, 8(12), 113. Https://Doi.Org/10.18415/Ijmmu.V8i12.3186
Widiastuti, R., & Wibowo, A. I. (2021). Pattern of Evidence in Decisions on Formal Review of Laws in the Constitutional Court. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(4), 803–827. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1844
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Reski Novianti, Husni Tamrin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
