Case Study of a State-Owned Company: How does Centralized Procurement affect Operational Risk?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i10.38815Keywords:
Current Risk Exposure, Centralization of Procurement, Bussiness Group, Operational RiskAbstract
This study aims to understand that the restructuring of the BUMN has a significant impact on the operational activities of the NUMN, along with its risks. The researchers used data saving from the procurement centralization process as an indication of the company's operational activities before and after restructuring. While variabel current risk exposure to indicate the conditions of the company's operational risk. Procurement centralization mechanisms tend to change before and after restructuring. So it gives the contractor his own sentiment about the operational risks and obstacles in the process. The data used refers to the company's monitoring report. Modeling between saving and current risk exposure uses double regression analysis. The results also indicate that changes in procurement centralization mechanisms have a significant impact on the company's operational risk. So in order to meet risk mitigation, the company should specifically regulate the mechanism of centralization of procurement between business groups.
References
Ansoff, H. I. (2016). Strategic Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02971-6
Bing, L., Tiong, R. L. K. (1999). Risk Management Model for International Construction Joint Ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Diakses melalui ascelibrary.org.
Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 55–73.
Cai, G., Xu, Y., Yu, D., Zhang, J., & Guojiang, Z. (2019). Strengthened board monitoring from parent company and stock price crash risk of subsidiary firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 56, 352-368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.06.009
Cevikparmak, S., Celik, H., Adana, S., Uvet, H., & Sauser, B. &. (2022). Scale development and validation of Transaction Cost Economics typology for contracts: A systems thinking approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 100769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100769
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., Dana, L., Kabbarra, D. (2024) u, B., Cooper, J. (2024). Developing resilience of MNEs: From global value chain (GVC) capability and performance perspectives. Journal of Business Research. Diakses melalui www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres
Cruz, M. G. (2003). Modeling, Measuring and Hedging Operational Risk. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.
Chorafas, Dimitris N., (2004), Operational Risk Control with Basel II, Elsevier (DNC)
Deloitte (2021). 2021 Climate Check Report: Business’ Views on Environmental Sustainability, Diakses melalui https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/services/risk-advisory/research/2021-climate-check-business-views-on-environmental-sustainability.html
Gaughan, P. A. (2013). Maximizing Corporate Value through Mergers and Acquisitions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hanggraeni, D. (2010). Pengelolaan Risiko Usaha. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi UI
Hect, A., (2021). The Role of Managerial Characteristics in FX Risk Management: Who Increases Risk?. Review of Managerial Science. Diakses melalui https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00432-x.
Heizer, J., Render, B. M., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.
Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2021). Organizational resilience: A Valuable Construct For Management Research? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 7–44.
Lienert, I. (2009). Where Does the Public Sector End and the Private Sector Begin? IMF Working Paper. Diambil kembali dari www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp09122.pdf
Lin, X., & Germain, R. (2003). Organizational Structure, Context, Customer Orientation, and Performance: Lessons from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1131-1151. Diambil kembali dari http://www.jstor.org/stable/20060605
Lind, D. A., Marchal, W. G., Wathen, S.A. (2018). Statistical Techniques in Business & Economics 17th Edition. 31-32.
Min, Y., Liao, Y.-C., & Chen, Z. (2022, March). The side effect of business group membership: How do business group isomorphic pressures affect organizational innovation in affiliated firms? Journal of Business Research, 380-392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.036
Sánchez, E. M. (2016). State-owned Enterprise Management: Advantages of Centralized Models. Inter-American Development Bank.
Sasongko, D. (2024, May 04). Kemenkeu. Diambil kembali dari Peran BUMN dalam Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional (PEN): https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/13437/Peran-BUMN-dalam-Pemulihan-Ekonomi-Nasional-PEN.html
Sumarna, R. A., & Solikin, A. (2018). PENGARUH RESTRUKTURISASI MELALUI PEMBENTUKAN HOLDING BUMN TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN BUMN. Substansi: Sumber Artikel Akuntansi Auditing Dan Keuangan Vokasi, 240-260.
Suwignjo, P., Gunarta, I.K., Wessiani, N.A., Prasetyo, A.E., Yuwana, L. (2022). Journal of Innovative: Technology, Market and Complexity Article : Framework for Measuring Process Innovation Performance at Indonesian State-Owned Companies. Diakses melalui https://www.mdpi.com/journal/joitmc
Wang, S., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., & Tong, W. (2022, February). Online procurement problem with risk hedging. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 164, 107909. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107909
Yu, Y., Jia, X., & Qi, H. (2023). Parent company board reform and subsidiary optimization of cash Holdings: A quasi-natural experiment from central state-owned enterprises in China. Research in International Business and Finance, 66, 102058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102058
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mahardika Dwi Jayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
