Building Integrity, Protecting The Environment: The Influence Of Anti Corruption Commitment On Corporate Environmental Management Performance In Southeast Asia

Authors

  • Lintang Putri Enggaringtyas Universitas Indonesia
  • Ancella A. Hermawan Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i9.3791

Keywords:

Anti-corruption, Environmental Performance, ASEAN 5, Board Independence

Abstract

Environmental degradation poses a significant challenge globally, with Southeast Asia projected to face severe climate change impacts by 2050. This study investigates the influence of corporate anti-corruption commitment on environmental performance in ASEAN-5 countries (Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines) from 2017-2022. Using data from 108 listed companies, the research examines how anti-corruption policies affect environmental management, measured by the Environmental Pillar Score (ES), and the moderating role of board independence. Regression methods are employed to test the relationships between the independent variable, anti-corruption commitment, and the dependent variable, environmental performance, as well as to evaluate the moderating effect of board independence. Findings reveal a positive and significant impact of anti-corruption commitment on environmental performance, underscoring the necessity for companies to balance stakeholder contributions and business operations. Anti-corruption measures foster transparency and compliance with environmental regulations, preventing illegal practices that harm both companies and economic growth. However, board independence does not significantly influence this relationship, potentially due to insufficient professional competence and ineffective environmental governance. The study suggests that while independent boards are crucial for accountability, their role in environmental sustainability needs enhancement through targeted training programs. This research highlights the importance of ethical corporate practices and robust governance frameworks in achieving sustainable business operations and environmental protection in Southeast Asia.

References

Abidin, A. F. Z., Hashim, H. A., & Ariff, A. M. (2017). Ethical commitments and financial performance: Evidence from publicly listed companies in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), 53–95. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2017.22.2.3

Alipour, M., Ghanbari, M., Jamshidinavid, B., & Taherabadi, A. (2019). Does board independence moderate the relationship between environmental disclosure quality and performance? Evidence from static and dynamic panel data. In Corporate Governance (Bingley) (Vol. 19, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2018-0196

Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(1), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9168-3

Alnabsha, A., Abdou, H. A., Ntim, C. G., & Elamer, A. A. (2018). Corporate boards, ownership structures and corporate disclosures : Evidence from a developing country. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2016-0001

Bernile, G., Bhagwat, V., & Yonker, S. (2018). Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 127(3), 588–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.12.009

Boubaker, S., Liu, P. Z., Ren, Y. S., & Ma, C. Q. (2024). Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91(September 2023), 102961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102961

Carrillo, M. I. A., De La Cruz, A. M. P., & Chicharro, M. N. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on corruption disclosure in European Listed Firms through the implementation of directive 2014/95/EU. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(22), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226479

Chen, Z., Zhou, M., & Ma, C. (2022). Anti-corruption and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from China’s anti-corruption campaign. Global Environmental Change, 72(December 2021), 102449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102449

Choiriah, S. (2020). The Effect of Stakeholder Power, Board Gender Diversity and Human Capital on Environmental Disclosure with Board Independent as Moderation Variable. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 11(12), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.7176/rjfa/11-12-04

Cole, M. A. (2007). Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 62(3–4), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.003

Dong, Y., Liang, C., & Wanyin, Z. (2023). Board diversity and firm performance: impact of ESG activities in China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 36(1), 1592–1609. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2090406

Freeman, R. E., & Harrison, J. S. (2018). [Chapter 1 from] Stakeholder Theory_ Concepts and Strategies.

G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. (2016). In G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264257443-tr

Handoyo, S. (2023). Worldwide governance indicators: Cross country data set 2012–2022. Data in Brief, 51, 109814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109814

Lisciandra, M., & Migliardo, C. (2017). An Empirical Study of the Impact of Corruption on Environmental Performance: Evidence from Panel Data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(2), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0019-1

McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001

Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3

Nguyen, T. H. H., Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., & Wu, Y. (2021). Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2313–2331. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2748

Papyrakis, E., Rieger, M., & Gilberthorpe, E. (2017). Corruption and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Journal of Development Studies, 53(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1160065

Peng, H., Zhang, J., Zhong, S., & Li, P. (2021). Corporate governance, technical efficiency and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese listed tourism firms. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48(September 2020), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.06.005

Sarhan, A. A., & Gerged, A. M. (2023). Do corporate anti-bribery and corruption commitments enhance environmental management performance? The moderating role of corporate social responsibility accountability and executive compensation governance. Journal of Environmental Management, 341(March), 118063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118063

Song, Y., Feng, T., & Jiang, W. (2017). The influence of green external integration on firm performance: Does firm size matter? Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081328

Sundström, A. (2016). Understanding illegality and corruption in forest governance. Journal of Environmental Management, 181, 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.020

Wang, S., Yuan, Y., & Wang, H. (2019). Corruption, hidden economy and environmental pollution: A spatial econometric analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162871

Wu, X., & Li, H. (2015). Board independence and the quality of board monitoring:Evidence from china. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 11(3), 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-07-2014-0101

Zhang, Q., & Ma, Y. (2021). The impact of environmental management on firm economic performance: The mediating effect of green innovation and the moderating effect of environmental leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126057

Downloads

Published

2024-09-20

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.