Hybridity and Paradox: The Cultural Bridge of Gen Z (A Critical Multimodal Discourse Analysis on the X Account @Aniesbubble)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i8.1759Keywords:
hybridity budaya, paradox, critical multimodal discourse, K-pop, komu-nikasi politik.Abstract
Social media, such as Twitter, enable immediate and delayed interaction with a wide audience. Online personas of political figures, such as the X account @aniesbubble, are in the spotlight in the 2024 election campaign, especially in attracting the attention of potential young voters in Indonesia. This research aims to ana-lyze the critical multimodal discourse on X @aniesbubble account in the context of the 2024 election political campaign. The main focus is to understand how multimodal ele-ments are used to shape opinions and interactions with audiences, as well as the implica-tions of using this strategy in cultural and political contexts. This research uses a qualita-tive method with a multimodal critical discourse analysis approach. The main data was taken from the X @aniesbubble account in the time period before the general election until the determination of the election winner. The analysis was conducted based on Norman Fairclough's theory, which includes three levels of analysis: text, discursive practice and social praxis. Additional data was obtained from relevant books, news articles, and journal articles. The research found that the @aniesbubble X account succeeded in creating an authentic and attractive political persona for the younger generation through the use of glocalization and cultural hybridity strategies. The account also demonstrates the dynamic interaction between global and local influences, and is able to convert social capital into economic capital through the active participation of fans. The findings suggest that social media plays an important role in shaping political and cultural narratives.
References
Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46–65.
Chang, W., & Yun, S. (2022). South Korea in 2021: a noisy and murky presidential race, unstoppable COVID-19, and the ongoing globalization of Hallyu. Asian Survey, 62(1), 43–52.
Collins, S., & DeWitt, J. (2023). Words Matter: Presidents Obama and Trump, Twitter, and US Soft Power. World Affairs, 186(3), 530–571.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Fairclough, N. (2013a). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013b). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9–20). Routledge.
Ganghariya, G. (2020). “Proliferation of Hallyu Wave And Korean Popular Culture Across The World: A Systematic Literature Review From 2000-2019. Journal of Content, Community & Communication, 11(6), 177–207.
Hahm, S. D., Heo, U., & Song, S. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Soft Power Between South Korea and the United States: A Theoretical Mechanism Approach. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 00219096231168065.
Nye, J. S. (2010). The future of soft power in US foreign policy. In Soft power and US foreign policy (pp. 16–23). Routledge.
Nye Jr, J. S., & Jisi, W. (2009). Hard Decisions on Soft Power. Harvard International Review, 31(2).
Song, S. (2019). North Korean Denuclearization: Getting It Right. Johns Hopkins University.
Sonnevend, J., & Steiert, O. (2022). The power of predictability: How Angela Merkel constructed her authenticity on Instagram. New Media & Society, 14614448221138472.
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (n.d.). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource 2016. Retrieved From.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ondo Ria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.