Analysis Of The State Financial Losses To Subsidiaries Of State-Owned Enterprises In Terms Of Business Judgment Rules
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i8.1725Keywords:
State Financial Losses, SOE Subsidiaries, Business Judgment RulesAbstract
The recovery of financial losses suffered by subsidiaries should prioritize recovery efforts that have a non-punitive nature or without punishing a certain person who is considered responsible for the management of BUMN subsidiaries unless there is intentional unlawful conduct and there are elements of criminal acts in it. In accordance with the principle of business judgment rule, the directors can be exempted, because the directors are considered to have made business decisions in accordance with good faith. In this research, the author uses a descriptive analytical research method, because the author will describe or provide an overview of the object under study through the data collected. The form of research used in this writing is normative legal research, because this research uses legislation and court decisions and also legal norms that exist in society. Researchers also collect data in the form of decisions from the corruption court on corruption cases that harm state finances. Losses arising in subsidiaries of SOEs whose capital is not sourced from the state budget or is not equity participation of SOEs and does not receive or use state facilities, are not included in the State's losses. the role of the business judgment rule if the person commits acts of criminal acts of corruption not due to encouragement or coercion and/or business decisions that are not based on prudence from the directors, the directors will be free from legal liability.
References
, U. (n.d.). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, Selanjutnya disebut UUD NRI 1945, Pasal 33 ayat (2).
Arifin P. Soeria Atmadja. (2017). Keuangan Publik dalam Prespektif Hukum; Teori, Praktik, dan Kritik Edisi III, (Depok: Rajawali Press, 2017).
BUMN, P. (n.d.). Peraturan Menteri Badan Usaha Milik Negara Tentang Pedoman Pengangkatan Anggota Direksi dan Anggota Dewan Komisaris Anak Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara, Permen BUMN Nomor 3 Tahun 2012, LN. Tahun 2012 No. PER-03/MBU, Pasal 1 angka 2.
INALUM, M. I. (2020). Lewati Tahun Sulit, Raih Masa Depan, (Jakarta: Laporan Tahunan PT. Indo-nesia Asahan Aluminium, 2020).
Natun, J. T. K. S. (2019). status kepemilikan anak perusahaan BUMN. Mimbar Keadilan, 12(1), 1–12.
PT, U. (2007). Undang-Undang Tentang Perseroan Terbatas, UU Nomor 40 Tahun 2007, LN Tahun 2007 No. 106 TLN No. 4756, selanjutnya disebut UU PT.
Raharja, M. (2022). Identifikasi Kerugian BUMN Akibat Risiko Bisnis Dan Kerugian BUMN Yang Menyebabkan Terjadinya Kerugian Negara Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Direksi BUMN”, (Skripsi Sarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2022.
Simatupang, D. P. N. (2011). Paradoks rasionalitas perluasan ruang lingkup keuangan negara dan implikasinya terhadap kinerja keuangan pemerintah. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit FHUI.
Soekanto, S. (2015). Monograf Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Panduan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, dan Desertasi). Medan: PT. Sofmedia.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (PT Alfabet). PT Alfabeta. Instrumen Penelitian.
Suryanto, A. F. B. (2020). Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Anak Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara”, (Tesis Magister Fakultas Hukum Ilmu Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2020).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fajar Reyhan Apriansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
