Bank Liability Related To Errors In The Implementation Of Customer Fund Transfers (Analysis Of Decision Number 28/PDT.G/2020/PN BTM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i11.1520Keywords:
Normative Jurisdiction, Electronic Banking, Bank Responsibility, Arbitration, Consumer ProtectionAbstract
The purpose of this study uses a normative juridical legal research method with a case approach in Decision Number 28/Pdt.G/2020/PN Btm and analyzed with an evaluative method. The results of the study show that banks have the responsibility to ensure that every transaction made by customers is carried out correctly. Errors in the execution of fund transfers can cause material losses to customers and damage the bank's reputation. Court decisions regarding banks' liability for fund transfer errors provide important guidance on banks' obligations and the protection of customers' rights.
References
Anggraeni, D., Wahyuni, E., & Ritchi, H. (2023). Does Covid-19 Pandemic Increase the Use of Cashless Banking Digital Services? the Case of Indonesia. JRAK, 15(1), 37–46.
Ariansyah, K., Sirait, E. R. E., Nugroho, B. A., & Suryanegara, M. (2021). Drivers of and barriers to e-commerce adoption in Indonesia: Individuals’ perspectives and the implications. Telecommunications Policy, 45(8), 102219.
Eriksson, K., Fjeldstad, Ø., & Jonsson, S. (2017). Transaction services and SME internationalization: The effect of home and host country bank relationships on international investment and growth. International Business Review, 26(1), 130–144.
Garner, B. A. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary eighth edition, st. paul. Minn: West Publishing Co.
Mulyati, E. (2018). The Implementation of Prudential Banking Principles to Prevent Debtor with Bad Faith. Padjadjaran Jurnal of Law, 5(1).
Rahman, A., Hakim, S. H., & Pratomo, W. A. (2023). The Impact of QRIS Policy on the Development of Micro Businesses in Medan City, Indonesia. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 26(3), 294–305.
Rajasekaran, A. S., Azees, M., & Al-Turjman, F. (2022). A comprehensive survey on blockchain technology. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52, 102039.
Rodrigues, L. F., Costa, C. J., & Oliveira, A. (2016). Gamification: A framework for designing software in e-banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 620–634.
Shaikh, A. A., Glavee-Geo, R., & Karjaluoto, H. (2017). Exploring the nexus between financial sector reforms and the emergence of digital banking culture–Evidences from a developing country. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1030–1039.
Usman, R. (2001). Legal aspects of banking in Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wahjuni, E., & Prakoso, B. (n.d.). The Concept of Utilitarianism to Realize Consumer Protection in the Financial Services Sector.
Wang, Q., Deutz, P., & Chen, Y. (2017). Building institutional capacity for industrial symbiosis development: A case study of an industrial symbiosis coordination network in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1571–1582.
Wijayanti, R., & Naâ, S. (2022). Impact and Effort of Legal Protection for Stakeholders Due to Merger Activities Islamic Banks in Indonesia. EKONOMIKA SYARIAH: Journal of Economic Studies, 6(2), 121–135.
Zulham, Z. (2013). The Regulation Of Halal Products To Moslem Consumer Protection In Indonesia.
Zvolska, L., Palgan, Y. V., & Mont, O. (2019). How do sharing organisations create and disrupt institutions? Towards a framework for institutional work in the sharing economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 667–676.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Panca Priyo Hadi Susilo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
