IUS Constituendum Of Cross-Border Insolvency Regulation In Asean (Analysis Of The Uncitral Model Law On Cross-Border Insolvency And The European Union Regulation On Insolvency Proceedings)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i6.1400Keywords:
ASEAN, European Union, Legal Personality, Cross-border InsolvencyAbstract
Currently, ASEAN has an economic integration program that is stated in the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint. As is well known, the European Union is the only regional organization that has succeeded in creating economic integration in its region supported by a unified law. One of the legal unification that needs to be initiated by ASEAN in supporting its economic integration is cross-border insolvency regulation. Some international legal instruments that can be a reference for the establishment of the ASEAN Cross-border Insolvency Regulation include the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and EU Regulation 848/2015 on Insolvency Proceedings. However, the comparison between ASEAN and the EU is not equivalent. ASEAN is a regional organization that is intergovernmental in nature, while the EU is a regional organization that is supranational in nature. Therefore, the comparative approach and statute approach are the right approaches in this article's writing. As for the research method used in this article writing is normative research. The objectives of this article are to describe the legal personality of ASEAN and the European Union in relation to the establishment of cross-border insolvency regulation and provide an overview of the substance of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and EU Regulation 848/2015 to provide a reference for ASEAN to from cross-border insolvency regulation.
References
Akšamović, D. (2017). Eu Insolvency Law-New Recast Regulation On Insolvency Proceedings. Eu And Comparative Law Issues And Challenges Series (Eclic), 1, 69–94.
Anggriawan, R. (2020). Insolvency Proceedings: Asean And Eu Comparison On The Rules Of Foreign Court Jurisdiction. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 3(1), 35–44.
Borgos, J., Kinser, K., & Kline, L. (2023). The Borderless Market For Open, Distance, And Digital Education. In Handbook Of Open, Distance And Digital Education (Pp. 355–369). Springer.
Djaya, I., & Utami, V. (2021). Legal Issue In The Matter Of Cross-Border Insolvency In Indonesia Based On Law No. 37 Of 2004 On The Insolvency And Postponement Of Debt Payment Obligation. Proceedings Of The 1st International Conference On Law, Social Science, Economics, And Education, Iclssee 2021, March 6th 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Fischer, P. (2012). International Organizations. Vienna/Bratislava, 9.
Fuady, M. (2013). Teori-Teori Besar (Grand Theory) Dalam Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 1–2.
Ghio, E., Boon, G., Ehmke, D., Gant, J., Langkjaer, L., & Vaccari, E. (2021). Harmonising Insolvency Law In The Eu: New Thoughts On Old Ideas In The Wake Of The Covid‐19 Pandemic. International Insolvency Review, 30(3), 427–459.
Goebel, R. J. (2013). Supranational? Federal? Intergovernmental? The Governmental Structure Of The European Union After The Treaty Of Lisbon. Colum. J. Eur. L., 20, 77.
Ivanov, V. (2023). Historical Development Of The Models For Cross-Border Insolvency Regulation In Europe. International Conference Of Management And Industrial Engineering, 11, 347–352.
Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
Muhaimin, M. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Dalam S. Dr. Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram-Ntb: Mataram.
Puspita, N. Y. (2020). Hukum Regional: Asean Dan Uni Eropa. Penerbit Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.
Sari, N. H., & Indrayani, I. (2022). The Impact Of The Asean Way And We Feeling Concepts On Indonesia’s Involvement In Strengthening Regionalism. Negrei: Academic Journal Of Law And Governance, 2(1), 67–76.
Sitanggang, D. F. D. (2020). Implementasi Personalitas Hukum Internasional Asean Dalam Pembentukan Perjanjian Internasional. Jurnal Yuridis, 7(2), 372–404.
Sokol, E. (2021). The Fate Of Universalism In Global Insolvency: Neoconservatism And New Horizons. Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev., 44, 39.
Spuling, N. (2021). Cross-Border Insolvencies In Southeast Asia: Regional Insolvency Framework For Asean.
Suharsono, J., & Candra, S. (2013). Murabaha In Sharia Added Value, An Effort To Increase Probolinggo Shallot Farmers’ Economic Scale And Spirituality. Available At Ssrn 2596062.
Wignjosoebroto, S. (2013). Hukum Konsep Dan Metode.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrian, Gunardi Lie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
