The Effect Of JKP On The Percentage of NEET In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i8.1317Keywords:
JKP, NEET, OLS, sakernas, youthAbstract
The NEET rate in Indonesia is the highest among other ASEAN countries and has increased in 2022, coinciding with the first year JKP benefits can be claimed. The purpose of this study is to see and analyze the effect of JKP on the percentage of NEET in Indonesia. Using August 2022 sakernas data and 2021 podes data in the form of cross-section data, this study was conducted using the Ordinary Least Square method. The analysis used in this research is descriptive analysis and inferential analysis in the form of regression analysis. The results of the analysis show that a 1% increase in the number of youth JKP recipients in the district/city reduces the percentage of NEET youth by 0.62% in 2022. Suggestions for the government are to increase JKP participation among youth aged 15-24 years. Review the requirements, claim procedures and obligations of JKP beneficiaries, to mitigate the risk of moral hazard.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (n.d.). Potensi Desa.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Februari 2023. BRS, 35.
Baguelin, O., & Delphine Remillon. (2014). Unemployment Insurance and Management of The Older Workforce in A Dual Labor Market: Evidence from France. Labour Economics, 30, 245–264.
BPS. (n.d.). Istilah.
Citra, H. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Penyumbang NEET di Provinsi Jawa Barat. JurnalL Kebijakan Pembangunan, 17. https://doi.org/10.47441/jkp.v17i1.240
Ehrenberg, R. G., Smith, R. S., & Hallock, K. F. (2012). Modern Labor Economics: Theory And Public Policy. In D. Battista (Ed.), Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy (Eleventh E). Pearson Education, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429327209
Febria, A. Y., Ibrahim, A., & Kamarni, N. (2022). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Neet Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Indonesia. Jurnal Paradigma Ekonomika, 17(3), 591–602.
Gaffari, Abrar, D. H. (2019). Keputusan Usia Muda Yang Tidak Bekerja dan Tidak Terikat Pendidikan (NEE) dan Karakteristiknya di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi, 76–91.
Hidayat, A. R., Alifah, N., Rodiansjah, A. A., & Asikin, M. Z. (2024). Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan: Analisis Realis terhadap Perebutan Kekuasaan, Respon Regional, dan Implikasi Geopolitik. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(2), 568–578.
Mankiw, N. G. (2018). Pengantar Ekonomi Makro (Edisi 7). Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Nagler, P. (2013). How Unemployment Insurance Savings Accounts Affect Employment Duration : Evidence From Chile. IZA Journal of Labor & Development 2013, 1–25.
Nurrahman, A. (2019). Upaya Pemerintah Dalam Mengatasi Permasalahan Pengangguran Di Indonesia. Jurnal Registrative, 1–8.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2021). Penyelengaraan Program Jaminan Kehilangan Pekerjaan (Issue 47).
Rebollo-Sanz, Y. F., & García-Pérez, J. I. (2015). Are unemployment benefits harmful to the stability of working careers ? The case of Spain. Journal of The Spanish Economic Association, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13209-014-0120-z
Sari, D. N., & Ahmad, I. (2021). Analisis Not In Employment, Education or Training (NEET) Pada Usia Muda di Indonesia. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 16(2).
Sari, N. R., Sukamdi, & Rofi, A. (2022). Distribusi dan Karakteristik Pemuda NEET di Indonesia ( Analisis Data Sakernas 2018 ). Majalah Geografi Indonesia, 36(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.22146/mgi.59391
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Teger Ivo Bangun, Dwini Handayani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
