Implementation Effectiveness Law Number 4 Of 1996 Concerning Rights Of Dependents Case Study: Registration Of Rights Of Dependents In Pangkep Regency

Authors

  • Amiruddin Amiruddin Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i5.1239

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Dependent Rights , Law No: 4 of 1996

Abstract

This study is intended to analyze the implementation of registration of dependent rights in Pangkep Regency, for this reason, several variables have been determined as factors causing the effectiveness of the implementation of registration of dependent rights. This research is a research of Normative Law (Normative Juridical) and sociological (empirical) legal research. Empirical research was conducted on 50 respondents consisting of dependent rights holders or creditors in Pangkep Regency and also taken from the population which is the source in the implementation of registration of dependent rights, namely the Head of the Pangkep Regency Defense Office and PPAT Notaries who entered the research area. The empirical data is analyzed using frequency distribution. In addition to respondents as a source of data as mentioned above, the author also obtained data from the land map office of Pangkep Regency. The results showed that the implementation of registration of dependent rights has not been carried out in accordance with applicable regulations. It can be proven that there are still dependent rights that are submitted for more than 7 (seven) working days, and there are even credits that are not tied to dependent rights. In the implementation of registration of dependent rights in the future, it is recommended to improve the quality and quantity of human resources with training and mental education to be honest, fair and devoted to God Almighty.

References

Achmad, Y., & Mukti Fajar, N. D. (2015). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Adjie, H. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.

Effendi, P. (1994). Praktek Jual Beli Tanah. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Harsono, B. (2003). Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Sejarah Pembentukan UUPA, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Djambatan, Jakarta.

Harsono, B. (2015). Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Buku Dosen-2014.

Joni, H. (2016). Tanah Sebagai Aset Sosial Dalam Perspektif Hukum Agraria Nasional. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 7(1), 123–134.

Marziah, A., Rahayu, S. W., & Jauhari, I. (2019). Pembuktian Risalah Lelang Bagi Pemenang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(2), 225–236.

Permata, R. D. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Akta Perjanjian Jual Beli Lunas Tanah dan Bangunan yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris (Studi Putusan Nomor 179/Pdt/2018/PT. BTN). Multiverse: Open Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 39–48.

Rachmayani, D., & Suwandono, A. (2017). Covernote Notaris dalam Perjanjian Kredit dalam Perspektif Hukum Jaminan. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 1(1), 73–86.

Ridduan, M. (2022). ANALISIS YURIDIS ATAS KEDUDUKAN KREDITUR PEMEGANG HAK JAMINAN KEBENDAAN DALAM PROSES KEPAILITAN. Lex LATA, 3(3).

Rosadi, A. G. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Sengketa Para Pihak Terkait Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (Ppjb) Yang Dibuatnya. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 5(2), 243–259.

Samsul, I. (2004). Perlindungan konsumen: kemungkinan penerapan tanggung jawab mutlak. Universitas Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum, Pascasarjana.

Saraswati, A. F. A. (2015). Dilematis Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Melalui Parate executie Dan Eksekusi Melalui Grosse Akta. Sebelas Maret University.

Setiadewi, K., & Wijaya, I. M. H. (2020). Legalitas Akta Notaris Berbasis Cyber Notary Sebagai Akta Otentik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 6(1), 126–134.

Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.

Wulansari, E. M. (2020). Konsep Perlindungan Data Pribadi sebagai Aspek Fundamental Norm dalam Perlindungan terhadap Hak atas Privasi Seseorang di Indonesia. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7, 265–289.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-25

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.