Evaluation of the Campus Teaching Program Batch 6 on Literacy Improvement Based on the Kirkpatrick Model Level I and II at SMPN 1 MANIIS Grade VIII
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i4.1145Keywords:
Program evaluation, Student literacy, Kirkpatrick model, Campus Program Effectiveness SponsorshipAbstract
Program evaluation is one of the best ways to improve the quality of a program activity. The quality of the program will affect the achievement of goals for an institution or organization. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Campus Teaching Program Generation 6 in improving the literacy of eighth-grade students at SMPN 1 Maniis, based on Kirkpatrick Model Levels 1 and 2. The research method used is quantitative descriptive with a survey method, involving 30 eighth-grade students who participated in the Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) Class. Data collection techniques were conducted using questionnaires, tests, observations, and documentation. The research results showed a significant improvement in students' literacy knowledge, with the average increasing from 31.83 to 56.83. Additionally, the acquisition of N-Gain Score (0.5792) and N-Gain Percent (58%) indicates that this program falls into the "Moderate" and "Sufficiently Effective" categories according to the Kirkpatrick Model. Overall, the Campus Teaching Program has proven to be effective in improving the literacy of eighth-grade students at SMPN 1 Maniis, in line with Kirkpatrick Model Levels 1 and 2. The implication suggests that this program is worthy of continuation.
References
Ali, S., & Khaeruddin. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (S. Ali & Khaeruddin, Eds.). Badan Penerbit UNM.
Ambiyar, & D Muharika. (2019). Metodologi penelitian evaluasi program. Alfabeta. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=w37LEAAAQBAJ
Anwar, R. N. (2021). Pelaksanaan Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 1 Program Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN, 9(1), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.47668/pkwu.v9i1.221
Aprilia, R. N., Silmi, R. N., Dzulqadri, A., Fitri, D. A., & Saputra, D. (2023). Analisis Hasil AKM Kelas Literasi pada Siswa Kelas V di SDN 082/I Serasah. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 31703–31711.
Badu, S. Q. (2013). IMPLEMENTASI EVALUASI MODEL KIRKPATRICK PADA PERKULIAHAN MASALAH NILAI AWAL DAN SYARAT BATAS. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16, 102–129. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i0.1108
Engriyani, E. (n.d.). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Menggunakan Model Kirkpatrick Pada Institusi Pemerintah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, Desember, 2022(23), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7451683
Enzelina, P., Pangaribuan, F., Tampubolon, S., Rahmatullah, M. I., & Samosir, A. (2022). Meningkatkan Literasi dan Numerasi serta Adaptasi Teknologi di SDN 14 Talang Muandau melalui program Kampus mengajar. TRIDHARMADIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jayakarta, 2(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.52362/tridharmadimas.v2i2.909
Gueslau, A., Pebriawati, H., & Corresponden, *. (n.d.). Peran Mahasiswa Kampus Mengajar Dalam Mewujudkan Sekolah Sehat Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5(2), 2023. https://doi.org/10.30596/ihsan.v%vi%i.15268
HM, M. A., MANIA, S., & MAWARDI, A. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI EVALUASI MODEL KIRKPATRICK PADA PROGRAM PELATIHAN TEKNIK TERHADAP GURU PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM DI SMP. Educational Leadership, 3(1), 82–92.
Kennedy, P. E., Chyung, S. Y., Winiecki, D. J., & Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2014). Training professionals’ usage and understanding of Kirkpatrick’s Level 3 and Level 4 evaluations. International Journal of Training and Development, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12023
Muyassaroh, I. (2023). Implementasi Program Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 4 dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi dan Numerasi Siswa SD. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jppd/index
Nuraini. (2017). IMPLEMENTASI EVALUASI MODEL KIRKPATRICK (LEVEL 1 DAN 2) DIKLAT TEKNIS SUBSTANTIF PEMBINA KEGIATAN EKSTRAKURIKULER KEAGAMAAN PADA SMP DI PUSDIKLAT TENAGA TEKNIS PENDIDIKAN DAN KEAGAMAAN. Andragogi Jurnal Diklat Teknis, 5(1), 34–53.
Nurdayanti, V., & Casmiwati, D. (2023). ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS PROGRAM MBKM-Kampus Mengajar Angkatan I Di SDN Wonokerto 3, Kabupaten Jombang, Jawa Timur. 18(1).
Pepayosa, A. L., & Bataha, K. (2023). Efektivitas Program Kampus Mengajar Dalam Peningkatan Literasi Numerasi Di SD Negeri Pertibi Tembe. Zadama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.56248/zadama.v1i2.42
Program kampus mengajar. (2023). Buku Panduan Program Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 6 Tahun 2023 (Kepala Program Kampus Mengajar - Pertukaran Mahasiswa Merdeka (KM - PMM), Ed.; Juli 2023). Program Kampus Mengajar, Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Rahim, H., & Suryani, N. (2022). KEEFEKTIFAN PROGRAM KAMPUS MENGAJAR TERHADAP PENINGKATAN LITERASI DAN NUMERASI SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 40 PADANG. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 2(1). https://irje.org/index.php/irje
Sartina, & Indartono, S. (2019). The Effect of Learning Motivation, Social Environment, and The Attitudes Learning On Outcomes of Economic In SMA/MA. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 16(1), 87–100.
Sulistyawati, W., Trinuryono, S., & Wahyudi. (2022). ANALISIS (DESKRIPTIF KUANTITATIF) MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN MODEL BLENDED LEARNING DI MASA PANDEMI COVID19. 13(1), 68–73.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ala Aprila Ipungkarti, Dian Permata Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
