Resolution of Disputes Over The Regional Head Elections Post The Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUUXX/2022 Regarding The Implementation of Simultaneous Regional Elections in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i3.1132Keywords:
Authority of the Constitutional Court, Election and Regional Election Regime, Special Judicial BodyAbstract
Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013 which in its consideration states that the Constitutional Court cannot add authority that is not contained in the 1945 Constitution, so that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022 remains conditional Constitutional authority considering The Lawmakers also did not draft a special law as intended in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013. The problems are (1) What are the implications of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 97/PUU-IX/2013 after the enactment of Law no. 10 of 2016 concerning the Election of Regional Heads on the Implementation of Regional Elections in Indonesia?; (2) What is the impact of resolving regional election disputes after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022?; (3) What is the ideal institutional model for resolving setbacks in regional head election results? To answer this problem, a comprehensive study is needed, namely examining the 1945 Constitution, Law N0.10 of 2016, Constitutional Court Decision Number 7273/PUU-II/2004, Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/ 2013, Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022. Research Results: (1) The authority to examine and decide on the voting results of regional head elections is carried out as long as there is no special court, in order to provide legal certainty in resolving disputes over the results of simultaneous regional heads in 2024. (2) Look at the stages of regional head elections that have been advanced and have not yet been brought forward. (3) Model The ideal institution for resolving disputes over regional head election results must be a special ad hoc judicial body.
References
Amalia, L. S. (2016). Evaluasi pemilu legislatif 2014: analisis proses dan hasil. (No Title).
Asshiddiqie, J. (2016). Putusan monumental, menjawab problematika kenegaraan. Setara Press.
Fahmi, K. (2016). Pemilihan umum dalam transisi demokrasi: kompilasi catatan atas dinamika pemilu dan pilkada di era reformasi. (No Title).
Fauzan, A. (2009). Perundang-undangan lengkap tentang peradilan umum, peradilan khusus, dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. (No Title).
Ghufran, M. (2013). Ham tentang Hak Sipil, Politik, Ekonomi, Sosial, Budaya & Umum. Graha Ilmu, Yokyakarta.
Hoesein, Z. A. (2019). Praktik Ketatanegaraan Pasca Perubahan UUD 1945. Jakarta: LP2B.
Hoesein, Z. A., & Yasin, R. (2015). Pemilihan kepala daerah langsung: penguatan konsep dan penerapannya. LP2AB.
Huda, N. (2011). Dinamika Ketatanegaraan Indonesia dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Iriyanto, A. (2008). Baso Ence. Negara Hukum Dan Hak Uji Konstitusionalitas Mahkmah Konstitusi (Telaah Terhadap Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi). Alumni. Bandung.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, S. H. (2021). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Kumolo, T. (2015). Politik hukum pilkada serentak. (No Title).
Labolo, M., & Ilham, T. (2015). Partai politik dan sistem pemilihan umum di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Lutfi, M. (2010). Hukum sengketa pemilukada di Indonesia: gagasan perluasan kewenangan konstitusional Mahkamah Konstitusi. UII Press.
Manullang, E. F. M. (2017). Legisme, Legalitas dan Kepastian Hukum. Prenada Media.
Muhjad, M. H., & Nuswardani, N. (2012). Penelitian Hukum Indonesia Kontemporer. Genta Pub.
Ni’matul Huda, P. H. T. (2014). Negara (Perdebatan dan Gagasan Penyempurnaan). Fakultas Hukum UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Press, K. (2012). Demokrasi Lokal: Evaluasi Pemilukada di Indonesia. (No Title).
Rahardjo, S. (2012). Ilmu Hukum cetakan ketujuh. PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Rato, D. (2010). Filsafat Hukum Mencari: memahami dan memahami hukum. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.
Setiawan, D. B. (2011). Pemberhentian kepala daerah: mekanisme pemberhentiannya menurut sistem pemerintahan di Indonesia. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Siahaan, M. (2022). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (edisi kedua). Sinar Grafika.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. (No Title).
Widodo, H. (2018). Hukum acara sengketa pemilukada: dinamika di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Konstitusi Press.
Zoelva, H., & Ana, N. R. (2005). Impeachment Presiden: Alasan Tindak Pidana Pemberhentian Presiden Menurut UUD 1945. (No Title).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ridwan Syaidi, Zainal Arifin Hoesein, Ahmad Redi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
