Satisfaction Evaluation of Teaching Factory in Software Engineering Competence at Telkom Malang Vocational High School Using the Countenance Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i2.1037Abstract
The purpose of this quantitative research study is to determine the influence of Interpersonal Communication Skills, Self-Efficacy, and Public Perception towards The Glass Ceiling Phenomenon. There are four hypotheses in this study, 1. H1: There is no influence of interpersonal communication skills towards the glass ceiling phenomenon. 2. H2: There is an influence of self-efficacy towards the glass ceiling phenomenon. 3. H3: There is an influence of public perception towards the glass ceiling phenomenon. and 4. H4 There is a simultaneous influence of interpersonal communication skills, self-efficacy, and public perception towards the glass ceiling phenomenon. This study involved 189 respondents who matched the criteria of respondents needed by the researcher. The sampling technique used is convenience sampling. The results of this study show that the independent variables can have an effect of 0.822 or 82.2% towards the dependent variable. In addition, interpersonal communication skills have a negative influence towards the glass ceiling phenomenon of 0.047 or 4.7%, self-efficacy has an influence towards the glass ceiling phenomenon of 0.628 or 62.8%, and public perception influences 0,257 or 25.7% on work pressure.
References
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Burns, M. K. 2014. What is Formative Evaluation. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.
Damarjati, T. 2016. Teaching Factory. Jakarta: Salemba Empat Jakarta. Diambil dari https://psmk.kemdikbud.go.id/konten/1870/teaching-factory
Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. 2016. Grand Design Pengembangan Teaching Factory dan Technopark di SMK. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Direktorat Pembinaan SMK. 2017. Panduan Teknis Teaching Factory. Jakarta: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. Direktorat SMK.” Direktorat SMK, 13 January 2015,
Hadam, S., Rahayu, N., & Ariyadi, A. N. 2017. Strategi Implementasi Revitalisasi SMK (10 Langkah Revitalisasi SMK). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hasanah, N., & Purnama, E. 2018. The effect of product quality and service quality on customer satisfaction and loyalty: Study on the hotel industry in Surabaya. European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 9(2), 103-115.
Hasibuan, R. A., & Fahmi, I. 2019. Service quality and customer satisfaction in tourism industry: A case of Riau Island. Journal of Management and Business Education, 2(2), 104-113.
Jaya, P. R. P., & Dot, F. 2018. PENERAPAN MODEL EVALUASI Countenance DALAM MENGEVALUASI PROGRAM LAYANAN PAUD HOLISTIK INTEGRATIF. PERNIK Jurnal PAUD, 1(1), 10–25.
KBBI. 2016. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Diambil 3 April 2019, dari https://kbbi.kemendikbud.go.id
Kusuma, M. 2016. Evaluasi Pendidikan Pengantar, Kompetensi dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Dua Satria Offset.
Lukum, A. 2015. Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran IPA SMP Menggunakan Model Countenance Stake. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 25–37.
M. Bakrun. 2019. Modep Pengelolaan Teaching Factory Berbasis Potensi Sekolah dan Wilayah/Geografis. Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan.
Mahmudi, I. 2011. CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 6(1).
Mathison, S. 2010. The Purpose of Educational Evaluation. In the International Encyclopedia of Education (hal. 792–797). Elsevier.
Mavrikios, G., Chryssolourisa D., & Rentzos, L. 2017. The Teaching Factory- A Manufacturing Education Paradigm. CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems.
Muhadjir, E. 2016. Revitalisasi Pendidikan Vokasi. Jakarta: Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Pengarah. Diambil dari
Muhaimin, M. 2013. Model Evaluasi CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Diambil 11 Oktober 2020, dari https://www.kompasiana.com/muhaiminmoh /552ab300f17e611530d62496/model-evaluasi-cipp-context-input-process-product?page=all
Mulyatiningsih, E. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Munthe, A. P. 2015. Pentingnya Evaluasi Program Di Institusi Pendidikan: Sebuah Pengantar, Pengertian, Tujuan dan Manfaat. Scholaria, 1–14. Diambil dari https://ejournal.uksw.edu/scholaria/article/view/13
Nastiti, S. 2017. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Teaching Factory Dengan Model Context, Input, Process, Dan Product (CIPP): Studi Kasus SMKN 2 Subang. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Nirmalasari, M. 2011. Evaluasi Kurikulum Model Countenance Stake. Diambil 27 Oktober 2019.
Novalinda, R., Ambiyar, & Rizal, F. 2020. Pendekatan Evaluasi Program Tyler Goal-Oriented. Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(1), 137–146.
Nurtanto, M., Ramdani, S. D., & Nurhaji, S. 2017. Pengembangan Model Teaching Factory di Sekolah Kejuruan, 447–454.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pembangunan Sumber Daya Industri. 2015. Diambil dari www.hukumonline.com
Pramudyo, A. 2014. Mempersiapkan Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN Tahun 2015. JBMA, 2. Diambil dari https://www.scribd.com/doc/315059884/Mempersiapkan-Sumber-Daya -Manusia-Indonesia-Dalam-Menghadapi-Masyarakat-Ekonomi-Asean-Tahun-2015
Riduwan. 2013. Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Riduwan, & Sunarto. 2013. Pengantar Statistik untuk Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial, Ekonomi, Komunikasi dan Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rusdiana. 2017. Manajemen Evaluasi Program Pendidikan (Konsep, prinsip, dan aplikasinya di Sekolah/Madrasah). Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Selegi, S. F. 2020. Model Evaluasi Formatif-Sumatif Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Perencanaan Pengajaran Geografi, (May).
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, S., C. L. 2014. Evaluation Theory, Models, & Application. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Subekti, S., Ana, A., & Barliana, M. S. 2019. Communication Skills Improvement Through the Teaching Factory Model. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Publisher’s Office, 4, 35–41.
Sudaryono. 2012. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2016. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukardi. 2012. Evaluasi Pendidikan – Prinsip & Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sukardi. 2014. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Kepelatihan. Jakarta: PT Cahaya Prima Sentosa.
Sukardi, M. 2010. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Thanabalan, T. V., Siraj, S., & Alias, N. 2015. Evaluation of a Digital Story Pedagogical Module for the Indigenous Learners Using the Stake Countenance Model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 63–72.
Triyono, B. and Moses, J.F. 2019. "Design of Inductively Coupled Resonant Wireless Power Transfer System for Electric Vehicle Battery Charging." International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 9(1), pp. 371-376.
Tsai, W. H., & Chang, C. H. 2011. Measuring hotel service quality: A study in Taipei. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), 376-387.
Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum. Diambil dari http://stpi-binainsanmulia.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Lamp_2_UU20-2003-Sisdiknas.doc
Wood, B. B. 2010. Stake’s Countenance Model: Evaluating An Environmental Education Professional Development Course. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32 (2), 18–27.
Youker, B. W. 2014. Goal-Free Evaluation : An Orientation for Foundations ’ Evaluations. The Foundation Review, 5(4).
Yükse, İ. 2010. How to Conduct a Qualitative Program Evaluation in the Light of Eisner’s Educational Connoisseurship and Criticism Model. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 1(2). Diambil dari http://www.tojqi.net/articles/TOJQI_1_2/TOJQI_1_2_Article_6.pdf
Yusuf, M. 2015. Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta.: Prenada Media Group.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Paraskevas, A. 2013. Understanding customer satisfaction and loyalty: A hierarchy approach. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 1-17.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Muchson Attoyibi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
