Development Of An Interactive Compensatory Learning Model To Improve The Reading Comprehension Ability Of Grade Xi High School Students In Southeast Maluku Regency And Tual City, Maluku Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i5.1233Keywords:
English, Reading Comprehension Ability, Interactive Compensatory ModelAbstract
Reading is one of the important competencies in English. So far there are still many high school students who cannot read English texts properly and correctly. Various efforts from the government to improve the quality of education in the field of English through updates to the curriculum, improvement of facilities and improvement of teacher quality. But this is still felt to be unanswered. This research aims to produce a reading learning model product that suits current and future needs in high school. This study used an approach Research and Development. The subjects of the study were 11 teachers and students in 10 schools in the research site. Data collection techniques were carried out using questionnaires, interviews, observations, documentation and tests. Data analysis techniques are carried out using qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques (statistical tests). The results showed that there were differences in students' English learning outcomes for the three groups of good, medium and less who used the learning model interactive Compensatory and conventional learning. This is shown statistically using the t test, where the group of both tcount values (22.58) > ttable (2.02); medium group t valuecount (17.19) > table (2.02); The group lacks tcount value (10.26) > ttable (2.02). Statistically it can be seen that learning using models Interactive Compensatory More effective in improving capabilities reading comprehesion rather than conventional learning. Reading techniques scanning, skimming, bottom-up, top-down In this study produced a reading model Interactive Compensatory.
References
Abidin Jonah. (2010). Strategies for Reading Theory and Its Learning.Bandung, Rizq Press.
Ashby, J., & Rayner, K. (2006). Literacy development: Insights from reearch on skilled reading. In D. Dickinson &; S. Neuman (Eds.) handbook of early Literacy research . New York: Guilfrod Press.
Brog R Walter, Gall Meredith D. (1989). Educational Research; An Introduc-tion, Fifth Edition, Longman.
Carnine, D.et al. (1990), Literature direct instruction reading, Columbus; Merrill Publishing Company.
Dunkin MJ Biddle.B . (1974). The Study of Teaching New York, Nolt, Renehart and Winston.
Engle, T.L. and Snellgrove L. (1974), Psyhology. Its principles and Applica-tions,New York: harcourt brace jovanovich,inc.
Grabe, W. (1993),Current developments in second language reading research State of the Art TESOL ,Ins. Silberstein (eds), Esssays, Washington, D.C
Grabe, W., Stoller, F. I. 2002. Teaching and Researching Reading. Pearson Edu-cation. England
Grabe, W., Stoller, F. I. (2010),Reading in a Second Language Moving from Theory to Practice.Series Editors: carol A.chapelle and Susan Hunston Cambridge University Press.
Koda, K.(1996) L2 word recognition research: A critical review. Modern Lan-guage Journal, 80:450-60
Linderholm,T.,& van den Broek,p.(2002), The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educetional Psychology.
Sukmadinata. (1997). Development of theoretical and practical curriculum Ban-dung Remaja Rosdakarya.
Stanovich, K. (1980) Toward an Interactive-Compensatory Model of Individual Differences in the Development of Reading Fluently, Reading Research Quantery.
Tarigan, Henry Thunder (2011) Reading as a language skill. Bandung; space pub-lisher
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. Faqih Seknun, Usman Matdoan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.