Eduvest � Journal
of Universal Studies Volume 3 Number 1, January, 2023 p- ISSN
2775-3735- e-ISSN 2775-3727 |
||
|
|
|
EFFECTIVENESS OF POLY ALUMINUM
CHLORIDE COAGULANT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF IPAM BADAKSINGA, BANDUNG CITY |
|
|
Tati Artiningrum,
Mahesa Filiceldi Universitas
Winaya Mukti, Indonesia |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
|
|
The Badaksinga Drinking Water Processing Installation is an
installation owned by Perumda Tirtawening
Drinking Water, Bandung City, has 2 of these installations, the first of
which is a design from Degremont - France, built
around 1954 with a capacity of 1000 liters/second. The second installation is
an IWACO-Dutch design with a flow rate of 800 liters/second. The raw water
for the two installations comes from the Cisangkuy
River and the Cikapundung River. To purify the raw
water, PAC (Poly Aluminum Chloride) is used as a coagulant which is a complex
inorganic compound with a clear to yellowish color. The coagulant addition
process must be carried out efficiently because this coagulation process is a
chemical process that requires a large amount of money for the water treatment
process apart from chlorination.�
Excessive addition of coagulant doses will cause the cost of using
coagulant chemicals to swell so that it will have an impact on overall
operational costs. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness
of using PAC in reducing turbidity, in the form of the optimum dose of
coagulant, turbidity and pH. The method used is the
Jar Test which is a tool to test the ability of coagulants to determine the
optimum dose in a water treatment process. From the samples, the raw water
turbidity varied from 17.1 to 281 NTU, fluctuating due to geographical
location and environmental conditions around each and the degree of acidity
or an average pH of 7.13. After the Jar Test was carried out, the optimum
dose was produced at a coagulant concentration of 30 mg/l resulting in
turbidity in the range of 1.1 to 5.0 NTU and an average turbidity reduction
efficiency of 94.5%, the pH of raw water, after coagulation and flocculation
with the Jar Test simulation tool, there was a decrease of 4.1% to an average
of 6.99. This result is in accordance with Minister of Health Regulation No
492/MENKES/PER/10/2010 April 19 2020, namely turbidity of no more than 5 NTU
and a pH of 6.5 � 8.5 |
|
|
KEYWORDS |
Optimum
dose, Poly Aluminum Chloride, turbidity, raw water |
|
|
This
work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
4.0 International |
|
INTRODUCTION
The Regional Drinking Water Company Tirtawening
Bandung City currently serves 69.30% of the population of Bandung City from the
national target of 80%. Some of the problems faced by PDAM Tirtawening
include limited raw water supply, high leakage rates, clean water supply
systems that have not been integrated and limited capacity and competence of
human resources for clean water service providers. Then a Drinking Water Supply
System or SPAM was formed which functioned to produce hingga
water to customers.
IPAM Badaksinga in Bandung City has 2 installations, the first
of which is a design from Degremont - France, built
around 1954 with a capacity of 1000 liters / second. The 2nd installation is
designed by IWACO-Netherlands with a discharge of 800 liters / second. The raw
water for the two installations comes from the Cisangkuy
River and the Cikapundung River.� 2 Transmission pipes with a diameter of 850
mm drain raw water along 32 km from the Cisangkuy
River, while raw water from the Cikapun dung Riveris flowed through a transmission pipe with a diameter
(800-900) mm.
The intake for the Cisangkuy Cikapundung
River is in the Dago Crooked and Sabuga areas. The
intake is a building to capture raw water and drain it through transmission
pipes, consisting of intake doors, screen bars, collection tanks and outlet
pipes. From Sabuga the outlet pipe with a diameter of
600 mm has a maximum discharge capacity of 250 l / second while from Dago Bent
a diameter of 800 mm is used for mangrove water intake with a maximum capacityof 600 l / second. For Cisangkuy
intake, the maximum capacity is 1600 l / second, which then drains the water
into a presedimentation basin in the Cikalong area. Dago Crooked and Sabuga
intakes directly drain their raw water to IPAM Badak Singa
IPAM Badak Singa has
water treatment units which include 2 presedimentation
tubs, 8 coagulation units, 4 accelerators, 4 flocculation units, 4
sedimentation units, 30 filter units, 1 disinfection unit and 1 reservoir
unit.� The distribution service systemto customers is divided into 3 Service Areas, namely;
West Bandung, North Bandung and East Bandung areas. Its distribution through
pipelines by means of gravity to the service area. The Badaksinga
IPA is equipped with� a
Control Display Control Panel (CDCP
room) which functions to control the entire water treatment, from the
transmission pipe to the effluent control tub. The room is equipped with an
online process monitoring tool. One of its functions is tofind
out the amount of raw water and clean water produced.
The use of PAC (Poly Aluminum Chloride) coagulants is highly dependent
depending on the characteristics of the raw water, causing the results to vary
greatly so that information is needed about the quality of the raw water
source, as well as research in determining the optimal type and concentration
of coagulants to treat the river water so that it can be further processed into
qualified drinking water. For this reason, this study was conducted to obtain
information on the optimum dose of PAC coagulants by conducting coagulation
experiments on raw water originating from the Cisangkuy
River and Cikapundung River using a jar test tool so
that water quality was obtained that met the quality standards according to the
Indonesian Health Regulation No.429 / MENKES / PER / IV / 2010.
The technology applied starts from taking raw water, treating water to
become clean water which is very dependent on the quality of the source, then
through the distribution system is flowed through piping to the service area.
Water Treatment is carried out on water that basically does not ordoes not meet the applicable drinking / clean water
quality standards, so that elements that do not meet the standards need to be
removed or reduced. This is done by treating the water. In general, the water
contained in the area that can be consumed by humans, is sourced from
rainwater, surface water and groundwater. Of the three water source waters,
what can be directly consumed by humans is rainwater and groundwater with
certain criteria. As for surface water, generally cannot be consumed directly
because of several things, including causing health problems.
Water Treatment to produce drinking water is an effort to obtain drinking
water with quality in accordance withapplicable
standards. The method can be in the form of complete processing or partial
processing. Complete processing includes physical, chemical and biological
processing. For planning installation package units with a capacity between 1
to 50 l / second, the Indonesian Rice onal Standardstipulates in SNI 6774: 2008. The content of this
SNI consists of planning criteria, raw water, installation capacity, operating
units and others. The operating and process units on this installation package
consist of coagulation, si floccula,
flotation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection. Technical requirements
for raw water that can be treated by a Drinking Water Treatment Plant (IPAM),
include: Turbidity, maximum 600 NTU or 400 mg / L SiO2 ; The original color
content (as apparent colour) did notexceed
100 Pt Co and the color temporarily followed the turbidity of the raw
water;� Other elements meet the raw water
standard requirements of Government Regulation No. 82 of 2001 concerning Water
Quality Management and Water Pollution Control; In the event that the river
water area has a color, iron and or organic matter content exceeding the
aforementioned requirements but low turbidity (< 50NTU) then the IPA system
of Dissoved Air Flotation or other systems that can
be accounted for is used.
Coagulation andFlocation
Coagulation and flocculation in
a water treatment system are the most important parts. Characterized by the
formation of flocs that can precipitate indicating the success of a chemical
separation of solids. In the process of coagulation andfloculation,
what occurs is the turning of coagulants which are chemicals and the stirring
of these chemicals with raw water.
The approach to evaluating stirring and designing the unit has been
developed by T.R Camp (1955) who found that the fast stirring
operation (flash mix) and slow stirring (slow mix) are basically stirring
operations so that the required design parameters are also the same. The degree
of stirring is determined by the magnitude of the power (P) given to the water
during the stirring process, known as the velocity gradient (G) . the magnitude of the magnitude of G ,
indicates the degree of water turbulence, the greater the G the greater the
turbulence of the water. In the coagulation process, mixing chemicals and
splitting the stability of partikel requires a large
value.
Fast stirring that is widely used is divided into Hydraulic Stirring which
uses the effects of graphitation and mechanical
stirring, namely stirring using equipment driven by an electrically powered
motor. The stirring device is commonly called the impeller, based on its shape known as a paddle, turbine and propeller. The� purpose of stirring in the 2 reactors
is to produce collisions between particles and the number of collisions depends
on: The severity of the velocity gradient(G), the grain diameter of the
colliding particles and the number of the colliding particles
In the laboratory, the
application of coagulation and flocculation is carried out on the Jartest tool while at the water treatment plant, it is
carried out on 2 reactors, namely the coagulator and flocularator.
In the coagulation process, there are several determining factors for success
that are interrelated with each other, namely (Martin): The coagulant used, the
optimal dose affixed and the stirring process anta ra
coagulant and raw water. In the coagulation process known as flash mixing, mixing raw water with
coagulants that occurs in seconds is a process in which negatively charged
suspended particles present in water in stable conditions are made unstable.
The addition of positively charged coagulants which then neutralize the
negative charge through the process of destabilizing the particles.
After colloidal destabilization occurs, the next process is to drain in the
next reactor known as a slow stirring reactor for the clumping or flocculation
process. Stirring in the coagulation process serves to flatten the coagulant
affixed with colloidal particles in raw water. At flocculation, it is planned
for maximum inter-particle contact. The contact between particles is a function
of the velocity gradient that can be produced by stirring both hydrolyzed and
mechanical. Gradient velocity in water that causes collision/contact between
particles. The greater the velocity gradient, the more particles are in
contact. Besides that, the larger the velocity gradient, the smaller the floc
size will be, because itbecomes a large size floc
breakdown. Speed gradient, generated by arranging for water to move between
bulkheads or by mechanical stirring inside the reactor.
In hydraulic floculators, the stirring can be
done by flowing through thehoist horizontally or
vertically which can be classified into: Baffle channel Stirring through a
perforated plate and stirring with a Pulsator. In flocculations
using Horizontal Baffle Channel, stirring is carried out by stirring channeling
utilizing stirring energy derived from: Friction on the straight channel wall
and Turbulence on the turn. The advantage is :P control over stirring is easier
and capacity can be increased easily while the weakness is that it requires a
large area of land.
Types of Coagulants
The types of chemicals that are
often used are cationic polymer coagulants and metal salt coagulants. SNI
6774:2008, The type of coagulant used is Aluminum sulfate, Al2(SO4)3.14(H2O),
PAC or Poly Aluminum Chloride (Al 10(OH)15 Cl15), Ferri Chloride (FeCl 3.6H2O) and Ferri Sulphat
(Fe2(SO4)3.2H2O.�
● Aluminium sulphate.
Aluminum Sulfate (Al3(SO4)2.14H2O)
is an example of a coagulant of a metal salt. This coagulant is a coagulant
that has long been used for the coagulation process in water treatment, known
by the trade name of alum. �Aluminum sulfate produces aluminum hydroxide, Al(OH)3 which hasa pH
range of 5.8-8.5 for insoluble water. In conditions of high pH above 8.5,
aluminum hydroxide will dissolve again in water. This will affect coagulation.
Sufficient alkalinity is required for the formation and p ofthe
insoluble hydroxide deposit. Colloidal and color are eliminated by adsorption
on the hydrolysis of hydroxide metals. In order for coagulation to take place
properly in the use of aluminum sulfate coagulants, pH control in the range of
5.8-8.5 is needed, toavoid the re-soluble occurrence
of aluminum hydroxide dissolution.
The addition of Aluminum Sulfate�
coagulants to
raw water will cause a hydrolysis reaction in water, as in reaction (1) namely
the liberation of H + ions which causes a decrease in pH
● Polialuminium klorida (PAC)
It is a synthetic coagulant resultingfrom poly merization of aluminum chloride.� This coagulant is commonly used in drinking
water treatment plants in Indonesia. The difference with Aluminum sulfate which
is a coagulant of metal salts is in the level of hydrolysis in water.
Poly Aluminium Chloride (PAC)
is a 3m-nlong-chain complex polymer Alm(OH)n(Cl)3m-n which is often used as a coagulant in the
flocculation process in IPA. PAC consists of 3 types (SNI, 2018) namely types
A, B and C with different CAS numbers. CAS �number �is a unique identifier
number for each chemical, set by �the Chemical
Abstracts Service. Type A
is used in the paper �and water treatment industries, ranging in color from jernih (colorless) to yellowish and does not contain
sulfates. PAC type B, colorless or clear, is used in the cosmetics, water
treatment and other industries. It has CAS number
12042-91-0.For PAC type C, it is widely used for processingindustrial waste with a color range from clear to
brownish color.
As in the addition of aluminium
sulfate, the addition of PAC coagulants to raw water also causes a decrease in
the pH of raw water, as in the following reactions:
From the reaction that occurs, it can be seen
that there is a release of hydrogen which will cause a decrease in pH levels in
water.
In its use, it has several advantages,
including:
1.
The
corrosiveness is low because the PAC is a sulfate-free coagulant so it has low
corrosiveness. This affects the security of the security and ease of the
transportation and storage process.
2.
The use
of PAC coagulants can reduce and even eliminate corrective measures on the pH,
due to a wider pH range.
3.
Shorter
and simpler aliphatic and clusters of hydrocarbon chains are formed due to the
sulfur content with sufficient doses ofcarboxylic
compounds and cyclic chains that cause it to be easily bound to form flocs
4.
Can save
the use of materials for neutralization due to the not too extreme decrease in
pH, which ultimately has an impact on reducing the costs incurred.
5.
In the
process, it is simpler because it contains a special polymer with a polyelectrolite structure that can reduce the use of
auxiliary materials.
6.
The
active group of aluminate is reinforced with polymer
chains of the electrolyte group, makingthe
PAC-generated fl ok denser compared to other
coagulants.
Table 1
Quality Requirements of Solid Polyaluminum Chloride
No. |
Test Parameters |
Unit |
Requirement |
||
Type A |
Type B |
Type C |
|||
1 |
Aluminum oxide (Al2O3) |
mass fraction, % |
Min.27 |
Min.45 |
Min.27 |
2 |
Freedom(b/w) |
mass fraction, % |
0-85 |
80-85 |
45-85 |
3 |
pH Solution 1% w/v |
- |
3,5-5,0 |
3,5-5,0 |
3,5-5,0 |
4 |
Insoluble parts in
water |
mass fraction, % |
0,75 |
0,75 |
0,75 |
5 |
Iron (Fe) |
mg/kg |
Max.300 |
Max.600 |
Max.6.000 |
6 |
Sulphate (SO4) |
mass fraction, % |
Max.9 |
- |
Max.9 |
7 |
Heavy metal
contamination |
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
Mangan (Mn) |
mg/kg |
Max.30 |
Max.30 |
Max.30 |
7.2 |
Cadmium (CD) |
mg/kg |
Max.3.0 |
Max.3.0 |
Max.3.0 |
7.3 |
Lead (Pb) |
mg/kg |
Max.21 |
Max.21 |
Max.21 |
7.4 |
Chromium (Cr) |
mg/kg |
Max.21 |
Max.21 |
Max.21 |
7.5 |
Mercury (Hg) |
mg/kg |
Max.0.6 |
Max.0.6 |
Max.0.6 |
8 |
Arsenic |
mg/kg |
Max.3.0 |
Max.3.0 |
Max.3.0 |
NOTE: The mass fraction is the weight/weight |
Source: SNI 3822:2018
RESEARCH METHOD
Data collection is divided into secondary data collection and primary data.
The manufacture of standard solutions is one of the steps of activities in the
collection of primary data carried out after the preparation of tools and
materials. The coagulants in thisstudy used Poly Aluminium
Chloride (PAC) type A. Determination of the optimum dose of coagulant
turning was determined using the Jar Test method.
▪
Tools and
materials used:
- Jartest (lovibond).
-
Electron
balance
-
Glassware,
consisting of beaker glass, measuring flask, pipet of various sizes
-
pH meter
-
Turbidimeter
Hach 2100Q
-
PAC
-
Aquadest
▪
Sampling
The sample used in this study was raw water at PDAM Tirta Wening Bandung which was
sourced from the Cisangkuy river and Cikapundung River. The two sources of raw water are mixed
in the piping and then enter the reservoir.
▪
Turbidity
and pH
Observe the magnitude of the floc size, Measurement of turbidity and final
pH of the water sample was carried out after experiments using a Turbidimeter
and pH meter.
RESULT AND
DISCUSSION
From the results of jar test measurements for 28 days, data on the initial
turbidity of raw water, turbidity after the jar test, the initial pH and after
the jar test and the optimum dose of PAC coagulant as shown in table 2 were
produced.
Turbidity
Turbidity is a condition where
liquids cannot pass on light due to the number of soluble particles such as
inorganic and organic materials trapped in water and can cause effects on,
health, aesthetics and disinfection processes (Amir, 2008). Suspended particles
(TSS) can result in increased turbidity in water (Darnoto
and Astuti, 2009). The higher the turbidity, the
higher the suspended solids in the water. This indicates the presence ofa positive correlation between turbidity and suspended
particle levels. Suspended particles in water can be free and colloidal
particles of very small size, such as dissolved solids having a particle size
of <10-6 mm; �colloids 10-6 � 10-3 mm, and suspended solids > 10-3� (Effendi,
2003). During floods, turbidity in river water is caused by large suspended
particles. The average turbidity of raw water samples prior to the
coagulation-flocculation processis above the maximum
allowable threshold for drinking water quality requirements. �The
results of the analysis of the PAC coagulant jar test on the turbidity of raw
water in the Badaksinga IPA can be seen in figure 3.
Table 2
Comparison Between Turbidity and pHPa
da Raw Water and After Jartest
No |
|
Raw Water |
Dose Optimum |
Jartest Results |
||
Date |
Turbidity |
pH |
PAC (mg/l) |
Turbidity |
pH |
|
|
(NTU) |
(NTU) |
||||
1 |
06-Sep |
80,1 |
7,30 |
25 |
3,1 |
7,1 |
2 |
07-Sep |
29,1 |
7,20 |
25 |
3,3 |
7,14 |
3 |
08-Sep |
19,1 |
7,19 |
25 |
4,2 |
7,21 |
4 |
09-Sep |
22,1 |
7,20 |
31 |
3,1 |
6,93 |
5 |
10-Sep |
35,7 |
7,00 |
20 |
3,0 |
6,98 |
6 |
13-Sep |
17,1 |
7,29 |
20 |
2,9 |
6,64 |
7 |
15-Sep |
65,8 |
6,87 |
25 |
1,5 |
6,95 |
8 |
16-Sep |
65,9 |
6,78 |
50 |
3,0 |
6,75 |
9 |
17-Sep |
17,3 |
6,86 |
25 |
4,3 |
6,85 |
10 |
20-Sep |
81,0 |
7,30 |
40 |
3,8 |
6,86 |
11 |
21-Sep |
59,9 |
7,08 |
25 |
4,3 |
7,12 |
12 |
22-Sep |
281,0 |
7,12 |
55 |
5,0 |
6,73 |
13 |
23-Sep |
55,5 |
7,20 |
20 |
3,9 |
7,23 |
14 |
24-Sep |
19,0 |
7,14 |
20 |
3,7 |
7,24 |
15 |
27-Sep |
65,7 |
7,30 |
45 |
4,4 |
6,8 |
16 |
28-Sep |
127 |
7,12 |
50 |
2,0 |
6,83 |
17 |
29-Sep |
31,1 |
7,12 |
25 |
1,6 |
7,12 |
18 |
30-Sep |
32,7 |
7,14 |
20 |
1,1 |
6,92 |
19 |
01-Oct |
50,5 |
7,12 |
35 |
3,0 |
6,93 |
20 |
04-Oct |
85,0 |
7,10 |
25 |
1,7 |
7,12 |
21 |
05-Oct |
26,8 |
7,11 |
25 |
1,8 |
6,98 |
22 |
06-Oct |
38,8 |
7,16 |
30 |
4,1 |
7,15 |
23 |
07-Oct |
80,2 |
7,09 |
25 |
3,0 |
7,11 |
24 |
08-Oct |
30,7 |
7,14 |
25 |
3,8 |
6,98 |
25 |
11-Oct |
43,7 |
7,09 |
30 |
4,0 |
7,01 |
26 |
12-Oct |
76,6 |
7,21 |
40 |
4,9 |
7,01 |
27 |
13-Oct |
37,3 |
7,20 |
20 |
3,0 |
7,14 |
28 |
14-Oct |
57,6 |
7,21 |
30 |
1,8 |
7,12 |
Average |
58,3 |
7,13 |
30 |
3,2 |
6,99 |
From the results of the
examination, the turbidity of raw water ranged from 17.1 NTU to 281 NTU with an
average of 58.3 NTU. The concentration of PAC solution added varies according
to the turbidity of the raw water. In each experiment, the average concentration
ranged from20 ppm to 50 ppm. For high turbidity, above 200 NTU, the added
coagulant concentration is between 50 and 75 NTU. After jartest,
an average turbidity of 3.2 NTU with a maximum range of 5.0 NTU and a minimum
of 1.1 NTU was produced. Theaverage efficiency of the
resulting turbidity is 94.5%
pH (Acidity
Degree)
pH is determined and measured
from the H+ and OH- �content contained in water. pH measurement is carried out every morning before and
after the jar test which aims to determine the acidic or alkaline condition of
raw water samples that will be used for clean water treatment. The pH value
before the coagulation-floc processis already at the
maximum allowable threshold of 6.5-8.5. The results of measuring the pH value
in this study are as presented in table 2 and figure 4.
Based on
Figure 4. The average pH measurement after the grafting f-coagulation
simulation processusing jartest
conducted in the morning has a value with a range between 6.78 to 7.30. The
measurement value after this pH is already below the maximum allowable pH
threshold. The efficiency of a 4.1% decrease in pH is due to the release of
hydrogen ions (H +) For PAC coagulants, the resulting pH drop will
be smaller compared to Aluminum sulfate, due to the release of more H+
ions, as in the reaction equations (1) and (2).
CONCLUSION
The andstrengths that can be taken from this study are:
The turbidity value of raw water varies from 17.1 to 281 NTU,
fluctuating due to the geographical location and environmental conditions
around each river, namely the Cisangkuy river and the
Cikapundung River. After processing, the turbidity concentrationwas in the range of 1.1 to 5.0 NTU with an
average turbidity reduction efficiency of 94.5%.
The average acidity of raw water is 7.13, this value has met the
quality standard requirements, which is around 6.5-8.5. After the Jar Test, anaverage pH value of 6.99 was produced with a reduction
efficiency of 4.1%. This is in accordance with one of the advantages of PAC,
namely that its use does not cause too extreme a decrease in pH so that it can
save the use of materials for neutralization and ultimately have an impact on
reducing operational costs
REFERENCES
�Angelfire.com.November8,2001.Laboratory 7 The
Jar Test.Retrieved December 3, 2022, from https://www.angelfire.com/realm/ce221/jartest2.html
Budiman, Anton, et al. 2008. Performance
of Poly Aluminium Chloride (PAC) Coagulant in Purification of
Kalimas River Water Surabaya �into Clean Water. journal.wima.ac.id/index.php/engineering/article/view/1258.
Darnoto, S. and
Astuti, D. 2009. Effect of Poly Aluminium
Chloride (PAC) Addition on Color Turbidity Level and Total Suspended Solid
(TSS) on Leachate (Leachate Water) at TPAS Putri Cempo Mojosongo Surakarta.� Journal of Health.� ISSN 1979-7621. Vol. 2 (2).
Darmasetiawan, Martin. 2001. Theory and Planning of Water Treatment Plants. �Bandung : Suryono
Foundation.
Effendi, H. 2003. Review of Water Quality for The Management
of Aquatic Resources and Environment. �Yogyakarta :
Kanisius.
Kawamura, Susumu. (1991). Integrated
Design of Water Treatment Facilities. New York: John Willey & Sons,
Inc.
Marieanna, Kristijarti A. Prima
and Suharto Ign. 2013. Determination of
Coagulant Type and Optimum Dose to Improve Sedimentation Efficiency in Herbal
Medicine Plant Wastewater Treatment Plant X. Lembaga Research and Community
Service : Parahyangan Catholic University
Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number
492 / MENKES / PER / IV / 2010 concerning Drinking
Water Quality Requirements. Jakarta: Ministry of Health of the Republic of
Indonesia.
Reynolds, T.D, and P.A Richards. 1996. Unit
Operations and Processes in Environmental Engineering. New York: PWS
Publishing Company.
Indonesian National Standard (SNI), "Poly Aluminumuminum Chloride", SNI: 3822:2018, National
Standardization Council (DSN), Jakarta, 2018