Eduvest � Journal
of Universal Studies Volume X Number X, Month, Year p- ISSN
2775-3735- e-ISSN 2775-3727 |
||
|
|
|
LIVESTOCK BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGY BEEF CATTLE IN INDONESIA |
|
|
Ni Made Ayu Gemuh
Rasa Astiti Universitas Warmadewa
Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia |
|
|
ABSTRACT |
|
|
Indonesia is a potential country for the development of a cattle
breeding business because it is supported by the availability of land
resources that are used as feed sources. The success of developing a cattle
breeding business is highly dependent on the selection and application of a
strategy that is appropriate to the characteristics of the region. The
purpose of this study was to determine the development strategy for beef
cattle farming in Indonesia. The research approach used is qualitative with
data analysis using the Miles and Huberman interactive analysis model. Miles
and Huberman's interactive analysis model includes 3 main things, namely data
reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the
study with SWOT analysis show that Strength-Opportunities (SO) are more
recommended as a beef cattle farming business development strategy in
Indonesia |
|
|
KEYWORDS |
strategy, business development, cattle breeding |
|
|
This
work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
4.0 International |
|
INTRODUCTION
The livestock
sub-sector is one part of the agricultural sector that can be a supporter of
development, especially in the economic field. Some of the important roles of
the livestock sub-sector are providing meat, egg, and milk production to meet
public demand for animal protein sources with high nutritional value and as
industrial raw materials (Rianzani et al., 2018). According to (Pujosakti, 2016) the national beef supply comes from 3
(three) main sources, namely: smallholder livestock business, cattle fattening
industry using imported seeds, and beef imports.
The policy of
developing beef cattle business can basically run synergistically with the
activities that have been carried out by rural or local breeder households. The
demand for beef as a food source of animal protein continues to increase every
year, this is due to the increasing population and increasing consumption of
beef per capita. Meanwhile, the
amount of domestic production in 2014-2018 always fluctuates every year. To
meet this demand, Indonesia imports meat with a trend that tends to increase
every year (Wahyudi et al., 2021).
Demand for livestock
products increases from year to year in line with the increasing level of
public nutrition awareness. However, consumption of animal food in Indonesia is
not fully provided from domestic products, but partly provided through imports
such as beef and milk (Hubeis, 2020).
Beef imports are
still being carried out, because Indonesian local cattle are still unable to
produce premium quality meat. Imported meat has several advantages, namely it
is more tender, has a high degree of marbling so that it is liked by consumers (Anari et al., 2018).
Beef cattle business
development programs need to be directed by utilizing resources in an optimal
and efficient manner that are adapted to natural conditions, socio-economic
conditions of the local community, infrastructure, developed livestock
technology and supporting institutions and policies (Agustomo et al., 2020).
Business development
in livestock is shown to increase food security and people's purchasing power
through increased income. To be able to achieve the desired goals, the strategy
needed is to increase active participation from the community, to encourage
investment in livestock business (Suresti & Wati, 2012).
Based on the
background described above, the researcher is interested in conducting research
entitled "Strategy for Development of Beef Cattle Farming Business in
Indonesia"
RESEARCH
METHOD
The approach used in this study is a qualitative
approach that is used to find out or describe the reality of the events being
studied, making it easier to obtain objective data (Adhimah, 2020). A qualitative approach is a research and understanding process based on
a methodology that investigates a social phenomenon and human problem. In this
approach, the researcher creates a complex picture, examines words, reports in
detail from the respondents' views, and conducts a study of the situation
experienced (Arkandito et al., 2016). While the research model used is the interactive analysis model of
Miles and Huberman. Qualitative data analysis activities are carried out
interactively and continuously until complete, so that the data is saturated.
This analysis consists of 3 main things: data reduction, data presentation, and
drawing conclusions (Lisabella & Hasmawaty, 2021).
In data collection, documentation techniques were used
by collecting journals with the keywords animal husbandry, cattle farming, and
business development from various sources. Then data reduction is carried out,
after several relevant journals are obtained, grouping and removing unnecessary
data and organizing are carried out. Next, the presentation of data.
Presentation of this data began by presenting data from the analysis of various
journals regarding business development in business farms. The last thing to do
is draw conclusions. This conclusion is made after all the data has been
analyzed and presented.
RESULT AND
DISCUSSION
The type of beef cattle that has been widely
developed in Indonesia is the Bali cattle which is Indonesia's mainstay of beef
cattle. Bali cattle are the offspring of wild cattle which have undergone a
long process. However, the rate of increase in beef production has not been
able to meet demand due to various factors such as: the supply of meat
initially did not match the demand, which still experienced excess demand,
increased household income which tended to change consumption patterns towards
animal protein from livestock, including meat. beef, changes in people's tastes
tend to lead to beef consumption. In (Priyanto, 2011) the supply of national beef comes from three main
sources, namely: smallholder livestock businesses, the cattle fattening
industry by importing feeder cattle, and beef imports.
(Rusman et al., 2020) said that the national beef cattle breeding center
is a potential for the development of a national beef cattle breeding area.
National beef cattle breeding centers are determined parametrically with
weighting on: feed carrying capacity, livestock population, livestock
infrastructure, livestock disease status, farmer households, livestock
institutions and master plan support. Local government support for livestock
development is also a consideration in determining livestock centers.
SWOT
analysis
Beef cattle farming business management has various
strengths and opportunities as well as facing weaknesses and threats. These
interact with each other and need to be managed properly in order to benefit
farmers.
1. Strength
a.
The desire of
farmers to improve their standard of living is that they respond to their area
which is a rainfed land to raise cattle.
b.
The role of the
KUD, in motivating cattle farmers, is to provide guidance and technical
assistance for beef cattle development, to provide soft loans, to provide
credit for production facilities such as concentrates, drugs, and equipment, as
well as to accommodate and market the meat produced.
c.
The government's
roles include: providing artificial insemination, establishing artificial
insemination service posts and animal polyclinics in beef cattle breeding
centers, increasing the beef cattle population with government assistance
programs, providing technical assistance and monitoring, as well as
diversifying processed products made from beef.
d.
The role of the
Pasar Bank with a policy of providing working capital in the form of credit for
one group.
e.
The KUD policy
that compensates if the meat from the breeder is not selling well.
2. Weakness
a. Weak
business management as seen from non-representative cages.
b. Farmers
provide feed that is not suitable so that the quality of beef decreases.
c. Standard
quality of meat produced is still below standard.
d. Feed
prices continue to increase, the feed given to beef cattle greatly affects the
quality of the meat.
e. Water
shortages in the dry season.
f. The
difficulty of green fodder in the dry season.
g. Cheap
price of beef.
h. Beef
cattle farming business has not yet reached an efficient business scale.
3. Opportunity
a.
Improving the
economic status of the community, with this increase will improve people's
consumption patterns. Thus, the desire to consume beef will also increase.
b.
The social level
in society has increased which has caused beef to become the main menu in
serving dishes.
c.
Demand for
processed products (meatballs, sausages, etc.) tends to increase.
4. Threat
a. Import
prices are much cheaper, so consumers switch.
b. Various
processed products that are sold are cheaper and have various types so that
they are more attractive.
c. The
abolition of the government's policy regarding busep (absorption evidence)
regarding government policies through the Three Ministerial Decree which
permits the purchase of domestic meat.
Development
Strategy
The development strategy is formulated based on
identified internal and external factors. Alternative strategies that can be
formulated in the development of beef cattle farming business are:
1. S-O strategy
a.
Increase
business scale at the farmer level. Existing financial institutions need to
provide convenience facilities in the form of soft loans with simple procedures
that can be used by farmers to increase business scale so that it becomes more
efficient.
b.
Expanding beef
cattle business.
c.
Improve meat
quality by improving beef cattle management.
2.
Strategi W-O
a. Carry
out the import of superior cattle breeds.
b. Combine
feed so as to produce minimum costs that meet the minimum requirements that
meet the biological and physiological requirements of beef cattle for
slaughter. Reinforcing feeds in the form of concentrates, rice bran and tofu
dregs are feeds prepared with special compositions with high nutritional value.
c. Diversify
processed beef products.
3.
Strategi S-T
Optimizing
the programs provided by the government in the development of beef cattle.
4.
Strategi W-T
Improving
the management of beef cattle based on the knowledge, skills and experience of
breeders. Hereditary raising experience needs to be combined with more modern
knowledge, technology, and management.
In research conducted by (Malotes, 2016) stated that the recommended
alternative in the development of beef cattle farming is the SO
(Strenghs-Opportunities) strategy, namely the strategy of comparative advantage
intended to draw advantage, namely the meeting between external opportunities
and strengths.
In
line with (Nursan & Sukarne, 2021) states
that the agribusiness development strategy that needs to be implemented is a
strength-opportunity (SO) strategy which includes a strategy to increase the
population and productivity of cattle by utilizing reproductive technology, and
agricultural technology parks, increasing HR knowledge and skills breeder.
CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis processed
with the SWOT matrix, it can be concluded that a suitable strategy in
developing beef cattle farming business in Indonesia is the
Strength-Opportunities (SO) strategy, namely by strengthening capital in order
to be competitive, expanding the business of developing beef cattle farms, and
increasing livestock yields. beef cattle.
REFERENCES
Adhimah,
S. (2020).
Peran Orang Tua Dalam Menghilangkan Rasa Canggung Anak Usia Dini (Studi Kasus
Di Desa Karangbong Rt. 06 Rw. 02 Gedangan-Sidoarjo). Jurnal Pendidikan Anak,
9(1), 57�62.
Agustomo, M., N Rahmawat,
N. R., & Sulhadi, S. (2020).
Kajian Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Peternakan Sapi Potong Berbasis Integrasi
Tanaman Pangan Padi (Oriza Sativa) Di Kota Pagar Alam Provinsi Sumatera
Selatan. Prosiding Webminar Nasional Series Sistem Pertanian Terpadu Dalam
Pemberdayaan Petani Di Era New Normal, 378�392.
Anari, O.,
Suryahadi, S., & Pandjaitan, N. H. (2018).
Strategi Pengembangan Ternak Sapi Potong Untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Petani
Kabupaten Manokwari, Papua Barat. Manajemen Ikm: Jurnal Manajemen
Pengembangan Industri Kecil Menengah, 13(2), 109�115.
Arkandito, G. F.,
Maryani, E., Rahmawan, D., & Wirakusumah, T. K. (2016). Komunikasi Verbal Pada Anggota Keluarga Yang Memiliki Anak Indigo. Jurnal
Manajemen Komunikasi, 1(1).
Hubeis, M. (2020). Strategi Pengembangan Sapi Potong Di Wilayah Pengembangan Sapi Bali
Kabupaten Barru. Manajemen Ikm: Jurnal Manajemen Pengembangan Industri Kecil
Menengah, 15(1), 48�61.
Lisabella, M., &
Hasmawaty, H. (2021). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan
Transformasional Dan Kualitas Kehidupan Kerja (Quality Of Work Life) Terhadap
Keterlibatan Pegawai (Employee Engagement) Serta Implikasinya Pada Kepuasan
Kerja Pegawai. Jurnal Nasional Manajemen Pemasaran & Sdm, 2(4),
209�226.
Malotes, J. (2016). Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Peternakan Sapi Potong Di Kecamatan
Tinangkung Utara Kabupaten Banggai Kepulauan. Agroland: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu
Pertanian, 23(3), 198�207.
Nursan, M., &
Sukarne, S. (2021). Strategi Pengembangan
Agribisnis Ternak Sapi Di Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat. Jurnal Pertanian Cemara,
18(2), 21�32.
Priyanto, D. (2011). Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Ternak Sapi Potong Dalam Mendukung Program
Swasembada Daging Sapi Dan Kerbau Tahun 2014. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 30(3),
108�116.
Pujosakti, Y.
(2016). Analisis Strategi Bersaing
Peternakan Sapi (Studi Pada Peternakan Sapi Ud. Brahman Kabupaten Nganjuk). Jurnal
Ilmiah Mahasiswa Feb, 3(2).
Rianzani, C.,
Kasymir, E., & Affandi, M. I. (2018).
Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Ternak Sapi Perah Kelompok Tani Neang Mukti Di
Kecamatan Air Naningan Kabupaten Tanggamus. Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Agribisnis:
Journal Of Agribusiness Science, 6(2).
Rusman, R. F. Y.,
Hamdana, A., & Sanusi, A. (2020).
Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Ternak Sapi Potong Di Kecamatan Lau Kabupaten Maros.
Jbmi (Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, Dan Informatika), 17(2), 120�129.
Suresti, A., &
Wati, R. (2012). Strategi Pengembangan
Usaha Peternakan Sapi Potong Di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. Jurnal Peternakan
Indonesia (Indonesian Journal Of Animal Science), 14(1), 249�262.
Wahyudi, T., Noor,
T. I., & Iswanto, A. Y. (2021).
Strategi Pengembangan Usaha Peternakan Sapi Potong Rakyat (Studi Kasus Pada
Kelompok Sri Rejeki Utama Di Desa Kalapasawit Kecamatan Lakbok Kabupaten
Ciamis). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Agroinfo Galuh, 8(2), 545�555.