Eduvest –Journal of Universal Studies
Volume 2 Number 8, August 2022
1.501 http://eduvest.greenvest.co.id
the non-juridical considerations are: the background of the accused, the legal consequences
of the defendant, the condition of the accused, and the religion of the accused.
Referring to Decision Number: 688/ Pid.B/ 2012/ PN.Dps. The judge described the
case that the defendant TEGUH T KHASAN was proven legally and convincingly guilty
of committing an offense that violated the law such as shopping, renting, replacing,
justifying as a pledge, justifying as a gift or waiting to pocket profits, peddling, storing,
exchanging, pawning, transporting, keep or secure an item which he knows or reasonably
should suspect that the object has been obtained due to a criminal act and has received or
occupied the placement, transfer, payment, grant, donation, safekeeping, exchange or use
of assets which are known or reasonably suspected to be the proceeds of the crime. as
referred to in Article 2 paragraph (1) with the aim of hiding or disguising the origin of
assets. As regulated and subject to criminal penalties in Article 480 to 1 of the Criminal
Code and Article 5 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law
Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money
Laundering in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 The Criminal Code as stated
in the indictment and the defendant can be held criminally responsible for his actions. Also
based on the consideration of the Panel of Judges legally proven to have violated the
provisions of Article 46 of Law no. 19 of 2016, regulates that those who meet the elements
as referred to in Article 30 paragraph (1) shall be sentenced to a maximum imprisonment
of 6 (six) years and/or a maximum fine of Rp. 600,000,000.00 (six hundred million rupiah).
If you are unable to pay the fine with a substitute penalty for 6 (six) months.
CONCLUSION
The conclusion of the author seen from the discussion above is that the policy of
criminal sanctions against burglary accounts through ATMs in the Criminal Code for theft
is contained in Article 362-365, in Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and
Electronic Transactions (ITE) the theft is in Article 30 paragraph (1), Article 30 paragraph
(3), Article 32 paragraph (2), Article 32 paragraph (3), Article 36. Law No. 3 of 2011
concerning Transfer of Funds theft is contained in article 81, article 83 paragraph (1), article
83 paragraph (2), article 86 and Law no. 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and
Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering is contained in Article 2 paragraph (1) and
Article 5 paragraph (1), Article 46 of Law No.19 of 2016.
Judge's consideration in Decision Number: 688/ Pid.B/ 2012/ PN. Dps. In deciding
the case of Account Burglary Through ATM that the defendant TEGUH T KHASAN has
been legally proven Aggravating things The defendant's actions can disturb the public and
can cause harm to others. Mitigating factors, the defendant admitted that he had never been
convicted; The defendant was polite in court and admitted frankly his actions, the defendant
felt guilty and regretful.
REFERENCES
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Arief, B. N. (2006). Tindak pidana mayantara: perkembangan kajian cyber crime di
Indonesia.
Atmasasmita, R. (1997). Tindak Pidana Narkotika Transnasional dalam Sistem Hukum
Pidana Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Budhijanto, D. (2019). Cyber Law dan Revolusi Industri 4.0. Bandung: Logoz.
Budi, S. (2013). Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime) Urgensi Pengaturan dan
Celah Hukumnya. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.