Bambang Arwanto
Poverty Reduction Analysis of Foreign Tribe Communities In Kutai Kartanegara
Regency 1.238
INTRODUCTION
The failure of quantitative transformation through the trickle-down effect
mechanism which was mythized in the growth paradigm in the 1970s, has only left
inequality and poverty. This concept is demystified by (Seers, 1979) who considers that
development is not only an economic issue but is more multidimensional in nature. This
thinking emphasizes on improving the living conditions of society as a whole, where
development performance is measured through three aspects, namely poverty, inequality
and equity. If development succeeds in reducing these three things, then development
aimed at realizing community prosperity can be considered successful (Prieur, 2009).
Poverty as a phenomenon only appeared openly and carelessly after Masri
Singarimbun and David H. Penny's book (1976). Population and Poverty: The Case of
Sriharjo in Rural Java was published in the mid-1970s. Previously, people avoided talking
about poverty in open forums, because it was considered to reduce the dignity and image
of the nation (Safadi et al., 2015). So since then poverty has become an interesting issue
that seems to have never been known before.
Various anti-poverty policies continue to be on the agenda, from charitable ones to
empowering ones in an effort to increase the productivity of the poor (Ravallion, 2007).
However, anti-poverty policies that consume large amounts of public funds have proved
ineffective (Chant, 2008). This is because the policy has not been able to increase the
capacity of the poor and their involvement in the development process itself.
The failure of various anti-poverty policies indicates that poverty is a complex
synthesis, so that the poverty situation is not the same in every place (Fiderikumo et al.,
2017). Assuming that poverty is a general phenomenon that can be approached in general
also with various uniform programs will result in a bias in understanding poverty itself
(Durant & Wilson, 2019). The inability to understand poverty as a phenomenon that is
unique and different in every place, has resulted in a centralized approach being used in the
agenda of every policy that is directly or indirectly aimed at alleviating poverty, the bias of
this approach results in social inequality, regional inequality, inequality in urban and rural
development, and increasingly the magnitude of community dependence in development
(Aliber, 2001).
The repositioning of the relationship between the central and regional governments
within the framework of autonomy gives a broader meaning that local governments have
central authority in development to improve community welfare based on the capabilities
and needs of the people themselves, where as one of the regencies that has abundant natural
resource potential, Kutai Regency also has a number of poor people of 7.20 percent (in
2021) with the largest distribution in rural areas, most of these villages are villages
inhabited by isolated poor people. and isolated along tributaries of the Mahakam River,
forest edges, and coastal areas with very poor infrastructure conditions, far from market
accessibility, communication and technological development, they meet their needs by
shifting cultivation, collecting forest products and hunt. The difficulty of communication
makes these remote villages far from civilization so that they can be classified as isolated
poor people (Hickey & Toit, 2013; Upenieks, 2022)
The concentration of the poor in rural areas in Kutai Kartanegara Regency is
closely related to the development gap between cities and villages, resulting in a lack of
infrastructure, communication, technology, as well as market coverage, education, health,
lighting, clean water in rural areas. as the basis for regional development. Due to the lack
of potential and village facilities, housing facilities, and environmental facilities, many