THE EFFECT OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND WORK EXPERIENCE ON EMPLOYEE CAREER DEVELOPMENT IN PT. CIPTA NIAGA SEMESTA LAHAT

This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of performance appraisal and work experience on employee career development and the effect of performance appraisal on career development and the effect of work experience on employee career development at Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat. The sample in this study were 36 employees of PT Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat. So the sampling method used in this study is a census sampling method, which collects data from the entire population. The analytical method in this study uses quantitative analysis with the help of the SPSS program. Based on the results of data processing using SPSS the regression equations obtained are: The equation can be concluded that if there is no performance appraisal variable (X1), work experience variable (X2), then the value of work experience is 8,216. If the performance appraisal variable (X1) is increased by one unit, it will temporarily increase the career development variable (Y) by 0.455


INTRODUCTION
PT.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat aims to distribute Mayora's products in modern and traditional markets, in addition PT Cipta Niaga Semesta will be the sole distribution so that prices in the market are uniform. The increasingly fierce open competition forces every company to seek superiority with other companies, through food products and by providing facilities and conveniences for each of its consumers. This causes each company to want to try to implement management policies.
Through the employee recruitment and selection process, the company makes performance appraisal a requirement in employee career development (Dar, Bashir, Ghazanfar, & Abrar, 2014). Career development for employees is a form of achieving a selfdevelopment cycle to be better economically and socially (Hameed & Waheed, 2011). Continuous career development for employees is an obligation that must be fulfilled by the company. For employees in particular, becoming a Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat employee is not only a means to fulfill basic needs, but in the end every employee wants a better career that can provide higher social status and greater power (Arikunto, 2010).
As a company National distributor of Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) products in Kota Lahat Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat also has a standard career development program for all of its employees. Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat procedurally actually already has a career program that is quite clear and measurable (Siregar & Hafnidar, 2020).
There are many factors that can affect an employee's career. Two of the most supportive factors are performance appraisal and work experience. With a clear performance appraisal in accordance with the field, it will be able to produce good human resources and can support skills, knowledge, thoughts and insights so that they can be ready to work in accordance with their fields and have innovation, high creativity, analytical power and are skilled in doing work (Fauzi, 2018).
One purpose of conducting performance appraisals is to assist management in planning and developing employee careers (Milliman, Nason, Zhu, & De Cieri, 2017). But in reality on Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat, many employees who excel are not accommodated in promotions and positions. In fact, half of the employees who were appointed to structural positions at Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat were taken from the process of transferring employees to other branch offices (Taurisa & Djastuti, 2012). http://eduvest.greenvest.co.id In addition to performance appraisal which is a benchmark in influencing employee career development. Work experience is also very influential (Idowu, 2017). To get a job must be accompanied by work experience that is true. No matter how high the value of the diploma achieved, it will be meaningless if you are faced with having to have work experience (Wiryanto, 2019).
An employee's career development program can be influenced by his work experience. Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat applies the prerequisites of working period (seniority) as a basis in determining whether or not a person deserves an increase in his career, with the assumption that a longer working period means more work experience. This condition further narrows the opportunities for employees of Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat to be able to get a promotion (Ulfah, Subiyanto, & Kurniawan, 2020).
In addition to these problems, there are still several problems that occur, including: employees who have not received formal education, both skills and training courses from the company, employees are not skilled, and have not mastered the ability and communication to market the company's products, employees are still lacking in work. effective, too many demands for rights, but the work has not been done, employees work passively. Employees do not develop themselves in terms of their work abilities.

RESEARCH METHOD
The population taken in this study were all employees of Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat, totaling 36 people.so the sample of this study amounted to 36 peopleemployee Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat The sampling technique used in this study is Census Sampling, which is a method of determining the sample when all members of the population are used as samples (Sugiyono, 2013: 85).
Sources of data in research can be obtained through two sources, namely primary data and secondary data. The type of research used in this study is quantitative research with a descriptive approach. Quantitative research methods are one type of research whose specifications are systematic, planned and structured, used to examine certain populations or samples.
Data analysis was carried out using a computer program, namely SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science

Reliability Test
The reliability test was carried out using Cronbach's alpha. The number obtained through Cronbach's alpha method is then compared with the coefficient (r) = 0.600. a) Performance Appraisal Variable (X1)

B.
Classic assumption test a.
Data Normality Test From the results of SPSS calculations in this study, normality is met if the test results are not significant for a significance level (a ) = 0.05. In the performance appraisal variable (X1) the significance level is greater (0.282> 0.05) thus, the data comes from a normally distributed population, the work experience variable (X2) has a greater significance level (0.145> 0.05) thus, the data comes from population that is normally distributed and the career development variable (Y) has a greater significance level (0.151> 0.05) thus, the data studied in this study came from a normally distributed population. b.
Data Linearity Test If the determined is 5%, then based on the output above, it can be concluded that the data used in this study can be explained by linear regression quite well because the value of Sig. linearity of the data is 0.000 (less than 0.05) and the value of Sig. deviation from linearity data is 0.114 (greater than 0.05).
c. Multicollinearity Test This test was conducted with the aim of testing whether the regression model found a correlation between the independent variables. This needs to be done because a good regression model should not have a correlation between the independent variables. This can be seen in the table of SPPS results: If the specified is 5% (0.05), then based on the output above, it can be concluded that the significance value of the performance appraisal variable (X1) is 0.002 less than 0.05, meaning that there is heteroscedasticity in the performance appraisal variable, and the significance value of the experience variable. work (X2) 0.000 is smaller than 0.05, which means that there is heteroscedasticity in the work experience variable.
Descriptive statistics Based on the results of data processing using SPSS as presented in the table above, the regression equation obtained is: The equation can be concluded that if there is no performance appraisal variable (X1), work experience variable (X2), then the work experience value is 9,363.
-If the performance appraisal variable (X1) is increased by one unit, it will temporarily increase the career development variable (Y) by 0.455.
-If the work experience variable (X2) is increased by one unit, it willincrease the career development variable (Y) by 0.791.
t test (Partial) This hypothesis test is carried out by using the t-count value with the t-table value. The calculated t value can be seen in the results of SPSS data processing in the coefficient table. The value of t table with a significant level of 5% and degrees of freedom (df) with dk in the numerator 3 and dk in the denominator 36, then t table is 2.042. By comparing the value of t arithmetic and t table, it can be concluded that the performance appraisal variable with t sig = 0.002 > 0.005, then Ho is rejected and Hi is accepted, this shows that there is a significant influence between performance appraisal and career development of Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat employees (Rakhmalina, Emelda, Hafid, & Periansya, 2017).

ANOVA or F Test (Simultaneous)
Simultaneous hypothesis testing is used to determine whether the variable job description and placement have an influence or not on purchasing decisions. The calculated F value can be seen from the results of data processing using SPSS in the Anova   (Fitriana, Nasution, & Akbar, 2020).

d. TestDetermination
The coefficient of determination is used to determine how much influence the performance appraisal variable (X1) and work experience variable (X2) have on the career development variable (Y). The value of the determination test can be seen from the table of data processing results using SPSS in the Model Summary table as follows: The value of the coefficient of determination () based on the SPPS data processing table above is 0.610. This means that the influence of career development variables employees of Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahatcan be explained by the variable performance appraisal and work experience with a contribution of 61%, while the remaining 39% can be explained by other variables not included in this research model (Arijanto, 2017).

CONCLUSION
Based on the results of data processing using SPSS the regression equation obtained is: . The equation can be concluded that if there is no performance appraisal variable (X1), work experience variable (X2), then the work experience value is 8.216. Y=9,363 +0,455 X_1 +0,791 X_(2 )+If the performance appraisal variable (X1) is increased by one unit, it will temporarily increase the career development variable (Y) by 0.455. If the work experience variable (X2) is increased by one unit, it will increase the career development variable (Y) by 0.79 The value of the coefficient of determination (r^2) based on the SPPS data processing table of 0.610. This means that the influence of career development variablesemployee Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat can be explained by the variable performance appraisal and work experience with a contribution of 61%, while the remaining 39% can be explained by other variables not included in this research model.
The value of t count can be seen in the results of SPSS data processingwith a significant level of 5% and degrees of freedom (df) with dk in the numerator 3 and dk in the denominator 36, then t table is 2.042. By comparing the value of t count and t table, it can be concluded: The performance appraisal variable with t sig = 0.000 > 0.005, then Ho is rejected and Hi is accepted, this shows that there is a significant influence between performance appraisal and employee career development.Pt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat.Work experience variable with t count > from t table or 5.586 > 2.042, then Ho is rejected and Hi is accepted, this shows that there is a significant influence between work experience on employee career developmentPt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat. Based on SPSS data processing the value of F table with a significant level of 5% anddegrees of freedom(df) with dk in the numerator of 3 and dk in the denominator of 36 is 2.86. The results of data processing are known that the calculated F value is 28.404. So the value of F sig = 0.00 > 0.05. From the results of the hypothesis test, the decision taken is to reject Ho and Hi accepted, meaning that together the overall performance appraisal and work experience have a significant influence on career development.employeePt.Cipta Niaga Semesta Lahat.